Sunday, May 01, 2011

62 Percent of American Teachers Work Two Jobs

This may be news to those who believe that those fat cat teachers have it made in the shade.  From today's NYTimes, some clips from an op-ed by Eggers and Calegari:

. . . .WHEN we don’t get the results we want in our military endeavors, we don’t blame the soldiers. We don’t say, “It’s these lazy soldiers and their bloated benefits plans! That’s why we haven’t done better in Afghanistan!” No, if the results aren’t there, we blame the planners. We blame the generals, the secretary of defense, the Joint Chiefs of Staff. No one contemplates blaming the men and women fighting every day in the trenches for little pay and scant recognition.
And yet in education we do just that. When we don’t like the way our students score on international standardized tests, we blame the teachers. When we don’t like the way particular schools perform, we blame the teachers and restrict their resources.
Compare this with our approach to our military: when results on the ground are not what we hoped, we think of ways to better support soldiers. We try to give them better tools, better weapons, better protection, better training. And when recruiting is down, we offer incentives.
We have a rare chance now, with many teachers near retirement, to prove we’re serious about education. The first step is to make the teaching profession more attractive to college graduates. This will take some doing.
At the moment, the average teacher’s pay is on par with that of a toll taker or bartender. Teachers make 14 percent less than professionals in other occupations that require similar levels of education. In real terms, teachers’ salaries have declined for 30 years. The average starting salary is $39,000; the average ending salary — after 25 years in the profession — is $67,000. This prices teachers out of home ownership in 32 metropolitan areas, and makes raising a family on one salary near impossible.
So how do teachers cope? Sixty-two percent work outside the classroom to make ends meet. For Erik Benner, an award-winning history teacher in Keller, Tex., money has been a constant struggle. He has two children, and for 15 years has been unable to support them on his salary. Every weekday, he goes directly from Trinity Springs Middle School to drive a forklift at Floor and Décor. He works until 11 every night, then gets up and starts all over again. Does this look like “A Plan,” either on the state or federal level?
. . . .
The consulting firm McKinsey recently examined how we might attract and retain a talented teaching force. The study compared the treatment of teachers here and in the three countries that perform best on standardized tests: Finland, Singapore and South Korea.
Turns out these countries have an entirely different approach to the profession. First, the governments in these countries recruit top graduates to the profession. (We don’t.) In Finland and Singapore they pay for training. (We don’t.) In terms of purchasing power, South Korea pays teachers on average 250 percent of what we do.
And most of all, they trust their teachers. They are rightly seen as the solution, not the problem, and when improvement is needed, the school receives support and development, not punishment. Accordingly, turnover in these countries is startlingly low: In South Korea, it’s 1 percent per year. In Finland, it’s 2 percent. In Singapore, 3 percent.
McKinsey polled 900 top-tier American college students and found that 68 percent would consider teaching if salaries started at $65,000 and rose to a minimum of $150,000. Could we do this? If we’re committed to “winning the future,” we should. If any administration is capable of tackling this, it’s the current one. President Obama and Education Secretary Arne Duncan understand the centrality of teachers and have said that improving our education system begins and ends with great teachers. But world-class education costs money. . . .
Does Duncan have a plan for teachers?  Sure does, as a matter of fact:  
  • discourage teachers from getting more training in their fields, 
  • discourage new teachers from professional preparation, 
  • evaluate teachers based on test scores that reflect the gaps they cannot close,
  • provide pay bonuses based on test scores, thus discouraging teachers from working with the children who need the most help, 
  • turn teaching into test score production management,
  • drain existing teacher resources, cut benefits, and drive down teacher pay by encouraging more corporate welfare charter schools, 
  • ignore poverty and pretend that teachers can fix poor children with total compliance and brainwashing,
  • portray teachers as selfish mossbacks who resist change,
  • continue to encourage the resegregation of American schools.



3 comments:

  1. Anonymous1:42 AM

    Where did you get the statistic that 62% of teachers hold a second job to supplement their income? I've been looking all over for such a statistic and the closes I've found is 11%.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. http://www.theteachersalaryproject.org/about-the-project.php

      Delete
  2. source:
    http://www.theteachersalaryproject.org/about-the-project.php

    ReplyDelete