"A child's learning is the function more of the characteristics of his classmates than those of the teacher." James Coleman, 1972
Showing posts with label United Opt Out National. Show all posts
Showing posts with label United Opt Out National. Show all posts

Tuesday, August 30, 2016

AFT Affiliate Exec Among United Opt Out Admins

by Jim Horn
 
A friend sent me a link to some reactions by AFT members to the recent national conference, where it seems that everything that transpired was tightly controlled by Weingarten and TURN veteran, Mary Ricker, to advance the Clinton candidacy, rather than to advocate for students and teachers.  Surprise, right?

Take a moment to read it, and you will see why anyone who is not a hand-picked enforcer of Weingarten's corporate agenda has no chance to affect the direction of this faux union:

AFT Leadership controls the membership. This must change. We are a top down driven union. The international relations and domestic positions of the Democratic Party, and specifically Hillary Clinton (who was present and gave a very disappointing speech about supporting public charter schools) shaped the convention. It was tightly controlled.
Given this basic acknowledged fact, it is hard to imagine the resistance moving toward closer ties with AFT and its affiliates, which are tightly controlled by the AFT home office.  Yet this is what's happening, as I noted a couple of weeks back just after the United Opt Out splintered over these very issues.

Soon after I published my commentary on the shake-up inside UOO and the announced joint meeting with the Houston Federation of Teachers, Ceresta Smith posted at Facebook a message from HFT president, Zeph Capo, about Houston's big CBE model initiative, which doesn't seem to bother him all that much.  I hope you will read the comments that follow his dissembling letter (click on the "See More" just below to get the entire entry).



More recently, the "new" UOO announced a new line-up of administrators, which now includes an executive from HFT.  

Tuesday, August 16, 2016

Weingarten Coopts United Opt Out National

Since Randi Weingarten put AFT's full weight behind both the Clinton Campaign and the passage of the charter school and CBE stimulus bill that passed through Congress as ESSA in 2015, AFT has been shopping for a new focus to move attention away from the fact that both AFT and NEA are now entirely on board the corporate education reformer gravy train.

By the summer of 2016, it was obvious that the corporate education unions had glommed on to the civil rights initiatives inspired by Black Lives Matter.  AFT's SOS March and DC Talkathon in July featured a number of high profile civil rights speakers, and the choice of the Lincoln Memorial as staging area was intended to symbolize the folding of education issues within a larger, amorphous social justice context.  If AFT could not pretend to lead a march against corporate initiatives that it supported, it could put some big money behind the largely ineffectual protests of Black Lives Matter.

What has become clear since July is that AFT is still on the move to alter the perceptions of many teachers who believe AFT and NEA both have sold dues-paying members down the corporate revenue river.  As a result, Weingarten and NPE have now managed to coopt the agenda of United Opt Out, which, heretofore, has been the only legitimate organization that has stood, until now, against CorpEd since 2009. 

Just as Weingarten took over BATs, she has now neutralized UOO, thus eliminating another threat to the corporate reform/corporate union status quo.  What is the evidence? Look no further than AFT's most loyal Houston affiliate, which is sponsoring a joint meeting with UOO in October.
The continued challenges of public education and the teaching profession have only been exacerbated by past and current policies and practices. Moreover, the gulf between civil rights organizations and education activists has not helped to provide workable solutions. UOO and HFT will bring together various civil rights organizations and activists groups to discuss the shifting landscape of public education and its impact on civil and human rights and civil society. The focus will be on creating alliances, building solidarity, and promoting a unified stance around the following issues: standardized testing, digital instruction, student and parental rights, allocation of funding, teacher quality, and the corporatization of public education. Ultimately, the goal is to see our consensus realized on the local, state and federal levels in terms of policies and practices.
You should note, too, that even though the new dubious alliance is shrouded in the same civil rights rhetoric as July's SOS and NPE charade, there is no mention of segregation, segregated classrooms, or segregated charters.

If you have been a past supporter of United Opt Out because of their fierce opposition to the oligarchs' education agenda, standardized testing, and segregated classrooms, you need to look elsewhere for that kind of leadership.

UOO administrators who left UOO: Morna McDermott, Tim Slekar, Peggy Robertson, Michael Pena, Rosemarie Jensen

UOO admininistrators who remain at UOO: Ceresta Smith, Ruth Rodriguez, Denisha Jones

Not to despair, however.  The real resistance lives on and grows stronger.

Tuesday, January 21, 2014

"STANDARDIZED" Documentary Philadelphia February 6


This very important and timely film is a must see. It will make its debut at Howard Middle School in Orlando, Florida on January 25 and will be in Philadelphia on Thursday, February 6 at 6 pm.

Check the web site to see where it is playing and bring it to a theatre or a school near you. 

Filmmaker David Hornberger of Rockfish Productions attended the Occupy the Department of Education events in 2012 and 2013 and will be giving a portion of the proceeds from the film to United Opt Out National. 

-----------------

The Alliance for Philadelphia Public Schools invites
 you to a screening and discussion of  


Thursday, February 6 - 6:00 p.m. - Ritz East, 125 S. 2nd St.

Philadelphia, PA 19106

Buy tickets

There will be a discussion after the film. Special Guests:

Helen Gym - Philadelphia’s Parents United for Public Education

Mark Naison - Professor of History and Chair of African and African-American Studies, Fordham University; author of Pure Bronx. He is the founder of the national Badass Teachers Association.

Jim Horn - Founder of the Schools Matter blog. He is author of “The Mismeasure of Education”. 

Tickets are $9.00.

To see the trailer and purchase tickets go to Rockfish Productions.
Online is recommended because if it sells out there may not be tickets available at the door.
**************

Wednesday, November 27, 2013

The Opt-Outers are Outed

Found this posted over at @thechalkface HT to Shaun Johnson. 

Now it's time to move on and change the discussion and have a conversation about what should replace the test and punish curriculum.


Need a new vision of what education should look like.

New York Magazine

The Opt-Outers

What happens if enough New York parents say they don’t want their kids to take tests?



Families and teachers protesting high-stakes testing in front of the offices of the Department of Education in April.
More than a year before 7-year-old Oscar Mata was scheduled to take his first major standardized test, his parents received word from his school that he was failing. The Department of Education calls it a Promotion in Doubt letter—a well-intentioned, if blunt, method used to get families to take notice of gaps in a student’s skills.
The letter arrived in 2011, around the time of Oscar’s second-grade winter break. Before then, he had been happy at the Twenty-First Century Academy for Community Leadership in West ­Harlem. His parents, Andrea and Juan, had been drawn to the dual-language school, where English and Spanish learners took field trips together for innovative social-­studies projects. They say that Oscar is great at math and loved science, music, and art. He loved reading, too, until he started to get tested on it.
“There was this transformation of the whole culture—and curriculum,” Andrea says. “I could see it mostly through the homework. It really looked like test prep. There were even ­bubble sheets.” Oscar had more than a year before the third-grade test, when students start taking the New York State ­English ­Language Arts (ELA) and math tests—but the thinking goes that the sooner they learn how to take big standardized tests and the sooner any skill shortfalls can be dealt with, the better they’ll do in the long run. Oscar, however, had a paradoxical reaction. “His interest in school,” says Andrea, “took this immediate plummet.”
She felt as if her son had been caught in a vortex: The school starts teaching Oscar differently, he loses whatever spark of curiosity inspired him to want to learn, and the school punishes him for it. He made it to third grade, but by then, test prep had come to dominate his classroom. Grand plans for science experiments and hands-on interactive projects, Andrea says, “would just kind of fizzle out and disappear because there wasn’t time to do them.”


Wednesday, September 25, 2013

United Opt Out Helps Get Folks United Against Common Core


By Ryan Ekvall | Wisconsin Reporter
MADISON — An unlikely alliance of progressives and tea party activists have found common ground in opposing Common Core State Standards in Wisconsin — even as the political elite on both sides support the new standards that are quickly spreading through schools.
Standing in the hallway that separates Assembly Majority Leader Robin Vos, R-Rochester from Minority Leader Peter Barca, D-Kenosha, two progressives and two tea party activists recently discussed leading the outside-the-Capitol charge against Common Core.
“What makes this not a left-right issue, what brings us together on this issue is that we care about our communities and our kids,” said Tim Slekar, dean of the School of Education at Edgewood College in Madison. “I’m no longer left or right, I’m a parent who’s doing what’s best for my kid.”
Slekar co-founded United Opt-Out National, an organization opposed to high stakes testing.
.
.
STANDING TOGETHER: Liberals and tea party conservatives have found agreement in their opposition to national education standards.
The Common Core is a set of national education standards meant to prepare students for “college and career readiness.” Proponents say the standards are “rigorous” and will help U.S. students compete internationally in the 21st century.
Common enemy
Opponents on the right say the standards represent a national takeover of education replete with intrusive student data tracking. Those on the left say high stakes testing dehumanize children and de-professionalize teachers. Both are wary of corporate interests that stand to rake in hundreds of millions of dollars from Common Core. They say better standards already exist elsewhere.
“Frequently there is a lot more common ground between people on the right and left than we recognize,” said Kirsten Lombard, organizer for the Wisconsin 9/12 Project, a tea party organization. “If we’re pointing fingers at each other and squabbling among ourselves, then we’re not noticing what they’re doing to all of us.”
Several dozen tea party groups have co-signed letters and organized phone call campaigns to state lawmakers asking for a pause on Common Core. They thought they had secured a foot in the door when a budget motion requested, but didn’t require public hearings and a legislative study of the new standards.
Those hearings haven’t been scheduled, even though several dozen Republicanlawmakers sent a letter to the Republican co-chairs of the Joint Legislative Council Committee responsible for the task.
“The first thing we want to do is to get those hearings scheduled and raise the awareness with the public and our legislators about this issue,” said Jeffrey Horn, organizer of the Prairie Patriots, one of the dozens of loosely affiliated tea party groups that have tried to find Capitol support.
Public awareness is lacking. An August 2013 Phi Delta Kappa/Gallup poll found that 62 percent of Americans and 55 percent of public school parents said they’d never heard of Common Core. Just four in 10 who had heard of Common Core said the standards would make American students more competitive internationally.
More than three in four (78 percent) Americans said increased testing doesn’t lead to better results. Yet in Wisconsin, the Department of Public Instruction, led by aDemocrat, will double down on multiple, high stakes assessments for kids in 3rd grade through junior year.
“We are creating a culture where teachers are teaching to the tests,” said Jed Hopkins, an education professor at Edgewood College. ”That means that teachers won’t take pedagogical risks. Taking risks are a very important part of doing the job well.”
Core concern
“It’s increasingly clear that the tail of the tests wags the dog as the teacher,”Michael Apple, an expert in curriculum and instruction, and educational policy at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, told Wisconsin Reporter. “Increasingly, when I talk to teachers they feel they’re losing their autonomy and that some of this makes it very difficult for them to deal creatively with a student population that is much more diverse than it’s been in many years.”
Apple said the politics of Common Core have become muddled with the bright lights pointed at public schools and teacher unions as the GOP has tried to buoy public support for school reform — including vouchers, charter schools and “school accountability.”
“No Child Left Behind basically was a de facto Common Core. It said it’s up to the states to develop strategies to get 100 percent of kids above grade level by 2014,” he said. “Democrats who were not in love with NCLB are now — especially at the federal level — the ones who want Core standards.”
.
.
TESTING PATIENCE: Some are concerned Common Core further cements the practice of “teaching to the test.”
Democrats supported No Child Left Behind before they were against it. The late Sen. Edward Kennedy, aMassachusetts Democrat, co-authored the bill with current House Speaker John Boehner, an Ohio Republican. More Republicans than Democrats voted against it. In 2007, Democratic presidential hopefuls made NCLB reauthorization an issue to set them apart from Republicans, the majority of whom still supported the law.
Those tables have now been turned.
While many Republicans, especially in Wisconsin, still support the standards, the Republican National Committee passed an anti-Common Core resolution earlier this year calling the standards “an inappropriate overreach to standardize and control the education of our children.”
The national standards are sometimes referred to as ObamaCore by the tea party right, associating the educational standards with the health care overhaul hated by conservatives.
Progressives have mounted only sporadic campaigns against Common Core. Their most recognizable spokesperson is Diane Ravitch, a New York Universityprofessor and educational historian who worked in both Republican and Democratic White Houses.
In Florida, the Democratic Progressive Caucus and the Badass Teachers Association recently joined tea party activists to oppose Common Core in theSunshine State. But Republicans there, for the most part, like the new standards.
Karen Schroeder, president of Advocates for Academic Freedom, wrote to DPI asking if individual school boards in Wisconsin, a state with local control of education, could dump Common Core.
“I received the following response from Emilie Amundsen, director of the Common Core State Standards Team at DPI:
“Yes. In Wisconsin, each school board has the statutory authority to adopt the state standards or any other set of standards, inferior or superior … School districts must have standards. The type, quality and scope of those standards are left to local school boards to decide. This has always been the case in Wisconsin, and this has not changed as a result of Wisconsin adopting Common Core state standards.”
Schroeder advocates citizens packing school board meetings and persuading locally elected officials to ditch Common Core, along with the textbooks and tests that go with them.
Such consensus is all the more interesting in a state where a third of Wisconsinites have said they stopped talking to someone they knew because of the politics leading up to the recall election of Gov. Scott Walker last year. It’s not a stretch to say Wisconsin is one of the most politically divided states in a politically divided country. Pollsters certainly have.
For this alliance of the left and the right, Common Core is the common enemy.
“Nothing about the Common Core has to do with the welfare of kids. It has everything to do with profits, making money, separating, sorting, categorizing kids and continuing to make more money,” Slekar said.
Contact Ryan Ekvall at rekvall@watchdog.org or find him on Twitter @Nockian.
Please, feel free to "steal our stuff"! Just remember to credit Watchdog.org. Find out more

Thursday, January 03, 2013

National Opt Out Day January 7


From Peg with Pen:

Children are NOT Numbers: National Opt Out Day, January 7th

Teachers, as you plan how to resist corporate education reform and rebuild public schools on National Opt Out Day (Jan.7th)  - or any day for that matter - here is one way to do it - do not allow others to refer to children based on their test scores. Children cannot be called "UnSats" or "Partials" or any other label attached to a number.

It is beyond disrespectful and allows teachers to become removed from the actions they are taking, therefore, they/teachers are less likely to wake up to the pain and suffering inflicted on these children from such abusive top down mandates. If children are numbers, rather than individuals with talents, personalities, ideas, heart, pain, and joy, it becomes much easier for corporate education reformers to move forward efficiently with their plan to profit off of these children as they are tallied, divided up and scattered randomly within communities.

When the community reads about the "failing" schools and the large numbers of "unsatistfactories" where does the learner, the person, factor into that message? That story?

The learner does NOT factor into that story. The aftermath of shutting down schools, reshuffling children and destroying communities - routines - consistencies - their feelings of belonging - none of these narratives or feelings exist in those numbers. They don't care about people. People, and the stories people tell, muddy the efficiency of numbers used within the business model being implemented in our public schools

If you hear a teacher call a child an "UnSat" don't allow it, politely ask the teacher to refer to the child by name - that child - that individual - who has a heart - a will - and a desire to grow and thrive as a confident and creative citizen. Ask a question about the child and use the child's name - model the behavior and shift the culture of your school. Teachers have heart and most often will recognize the horror in designating children as numbers, but the harsh truth is that in today's schools it has become part of the culture of schools - it is common place to refer to a group of students as "UnSats." It is a shameful practice, and as a teacher who follows the Declaration of Professional Conscience for Teachers I believe calling a child by his or her name is one powerful, yet simple step, that can be taken in resisting from within the challenging confines of our teaching profession - currently held hostage by corporate education reform.

Resist from within - don't allow a child to be addressed as a number or label.  I will continue to add additional ways to resist corporate education reform, but the most simple way is to remember that the child is a beautiful being that needs to be nurtured and supported, not divided, subtracted, and slapped on a data wall. Call the child by name, and upon hearing that name, memories and stories of the child will come forth and remind us to protect the child, that beautiful soul,  from those who have no heart.

Monday, November 05, 2012

Time for Moratorium on High Stakes Testing


My ed professor in graduate school used to say, "let the text speak for itself."
Sometimes, that is all you need in a moment like this.

However, I do have one "lingering" question.

Can we finally demand a moratorium on all high stakes testing?
 Or will we see NJ and NY go the way of NOLA
as we sit by why the profiteers continue to call the shots in education.


November 4, 2012

Back to School, Bundled Up, but With Lingering Questions



Cots lined the hallways, and toilets were limited or clogged, so some evacuees went to the bathroom on the floor. Volunteers, gagging at air made more fetid by unwashed bodies, took to wearing masks. “We gave them wipes,” a volunteer said, “but there’s only so much you can do with wipes.”
Custodians spent Sunday scrubbing and mopping, preparing this makeshift storm shelter in Hell’s Kitchen, which at one point housed some 1,000 displaced men, women and children, for the return to its day job — as the High School of Graphic Communication Arts.
The rush to sanitize the school was just one piece of the sprawling, shifting logistical puzzle, some would say nightmare, as the city’s 1.1 million public school students faced an educational landscape drastically altered by Hurricane Sandy. The city said that 57 schools were too damaged to reopen, which meant the city had to find new places for their 34,000 students. Eight buildings that normally house 24,000 students currently serve as shelters, and are set to reopen on Wednesday, a target several educators believed unfeasible. It was still unclear on Sunday whether students and teachers would be sharing their buildings with people now using them for shelter. (Graphic Communication Arts housed people evacuated from Bellevue Hospital Center.)
As of Sunday afternoon, 29 schools remained without power, with parents, teachers and students — many of them storm victims themselves — unsure when classes might resume, though the Department of Education said they were hoping to open Wednesday. Some of those that will reopen Monday might not have heat; the mayor advised that students wear extra sweaters.
The city Education Department was updating its schools Web site Sunday with the latest information and placing full-page advertisements in some newspapers. The mayor said the city made 1.1 million robocalls to parents over the weekend, telling them the status of their schools, though many families received follow-up calls with different information as situations changed by the hour.
“It is complex and people are going to make mistakes, and people are going to get misinformed,” Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg said at a news conference Sunday. Noting that schools would be closed, as planned, for Election Day, he added: “We know that, but it’s better to have another day of school, get most kids to school, find out where we need more resources, and then we’ll have Tuesday to try to adjust.”
Around 300 of New Jersey’s 589 school districts were to remain closed on Monday, said Barbara Morgan, a spokeswoman for the state Education Department. In a message Friday, John Bulina, president of the New Jersey School Boards Association, said it was possible some schools would “be unusable as educational facilities for quite some time.”
Some officials said they hoped to open schools by Wednesday, but cautioned against too much optimism. “Not all roads are safe for travel, student walkers, pickups and buses,” said an online note from Anthony Cacciola, the superintendent of the West Babylon school district, one of several on Long Island that were to be closed Monday. “The gas crisis,” he said, “has added another layer of great concern for staff travel and bus fuel.”
Students at the 57 New York City schools that cannot reopen will not relocate to their new schools until Wednesday. Sixteen schools in the eight buildings that have doubled as shelters were supposed to reopen Monday, but that date got bumped back two days after Department of Education officials toured the sites.
At Susan E. Wagner High School on Staten Island on Sunday, row upon row of cots made the gym look more like a Civil War field hospital than a high school. Piles of clothes and canned goods competed for space in the cafeteria with evacuees eating and milling about. Several dozen dogs, cats and birds — evacuees themselves — had taken up residence in the basement.
Because Staten Island was so brutally hit by Hurricane Sandy, it was not clear where all of the people housed in Wagner High School, which has 3,400 students, would go: many no longer had homes to return to.
Dennis M. Walcott, the New York City schools chancellor, said the city was working with the Department of Homeless Services to ensure safe reopenings on Wednesday. But some staff members at schools being used as shelters were skeptical.
“Everyone was kind of shocked to think they’d go through with this,” said Serge Avery, a social science teacher at Brooklyn Technical High School, one of the eight buildings. “It just did not seem feasible logistically.”
Ahmed Abdelqader, Brooklyn Tech’s senior class president, said many students were eager to return to class, especially seniors preparing for college admission, but, he said, “A lot of people were questioning whether they’d be safe at school.”
One teacher visiting Graphic Communications Arts, on West 49th Street, said it would be impossible for the site to be cleaned up in time. Evacuees and homeless men filled six floors, the teacher said and, unlike students, entered the building without being searched. “It had become a homeless shelter,” the teacher said. “The custodial staff would need an entire week.”
Some schools too damaged to open to students continued to serve multiple purposes. On Sunday, donations of clothes, shoes, nonperishable food, blankets and toys piled up at George L. Egbert Intermediate School, in Midland Beach on Staten Island. Adrienne Stallone, the principal, said floodwaters had bent the school’s doors, eaten away some walls and pushed others into different rooms. On Sunday, the school’s boiler was still under five feet of salt water in the basement.
The school has 1,000 students in grades six through eight who, starting Wednesday, will be taken to New Dorp High School for at least a week. Meanwhile, in Egbert’s gymnasium, gray voting machines lined one wall, draped with clear plastic tarps — the school was still scheduled to serve as a voting site on Tuesday, with the help of a generator, lights and heating tents.
“The transformer across the street is still underwater, and Con Ed says they can’t think of turning the power on until that’s dry,” Ms. Stallone said.
Michael Mulgrew, president of the United Federation of Teachers, estimated that 40 to 45 schools were most likely too damaged to reopen by the end of the school year, most of them in the hardest hit neighborhoods — Coney Island, the Rockaways and Midland Beach. “It’s going to be somewhat chaotic in these hard hit areas,” he said, “There are families and children who haven’t had heat or hot food for days. There are going to be problems.”
Chiara Coletti, a spokeswoman for the principals’ union, said principals were “very sympathetic” and committed to streamlining the integration of dislocated schools. And Marina Vinitskaya, the principal of the It Takes a Village Academy, which shares the old Samuel J. Tilden High School building in East Flatbush, Brooklyn, with two other schools, is expecting some 750 middle school students on Wednesday. The four principals would meet Monday, she said, to discuss the details. “We will be using every space that will be available and put our schools on a different schedule to make this happen.”
Guidance staff members at many schools were preparing counseling centers to tend to the psychological needs of students who might have been living without power or heat, or who had lost their homes.
The last time the city’s school system was so broadly disrupted was after the Sept. 11 attack. But Harold O. Levy, who led the Education Department then, said the terrorist attack left a broader psychological wound on students, with the logistics of finding classrooms for dislocated students being a secondary concern. “It’s unfortunate, it’s disruptive, and it’s particularly a concern within the context of our really awful truancy problems in this country,” Mr. Levy said, of the effects of school days lost to Hurricane Sandy, “But seen in this perspective it’s manageable.”
M. Carole Schafenberg, the principal at Public School 76 in Queens, is expecting up to 200 students from Public School 78, which cannot reopen because of water damage. Ms. Schafenberg said her school was underutilized anyway, and that now every empty classroom would be filled. She was most concerned however with busing problems — she heard that much of the bus company’s fleet that served her school was ruined, and worried about the lack of gas. She also wondered how to reach displaced children who might have moved in with other family members — should they instead enroll in the nearest school? “I don’t think anybody has found that out,” she said.



Tuesday, May 15, 2012

Opt-Out Parent in NJ: . . . the "nice" strategy got me nowhere


Posted at Opt Out of the State Test:
Jean Schutt McTavishWe are in week 2 of the opt out for my 4th grader in NJ. We met with the Superintendent and the Board of Education last night. The Superintendent seemed embarrassed that he had threatened me with a report of truancy to the child welfare agency in NJ. He avoided me like the plague. My sister tag teamed with me, so she talked to him for a good hour. Everyone seemed to agree with our position. They were just afraid of the strategy and the effect it could have on our town's accountability status. 97% of the kids in our town graduate from HS on time. They really have nothing to worry about. One Board member said that my strategy of opting out might be too harsh and scare off like minded parents. I told the Board member that I have tried being nice about this for almost 10 years and that the "nice" strategy got me no where. I told her that it is time for some strong bold moves. The one thing that I have learned in the past 3 1/2 weeks of opting out is that when you stand up and say NO, people listen...

Saturday, May 12, 2012

550 Parents Opt Out in Snohomish, Washington

We all know that teachers can advocate for children, organize opposition, and try to make the abusive testing environments as humane as possible.  But we know, too, that parents hold the key to bringing down the high-stakes testing madness that has corrupted our schools and damaged learning for a whole generation of kids.  Is it worth it?  Parents say no, in ever-increasing numbers.

When we get enough to make these tests as psychometrically pointless as they are pedagogically meaningless now, then things will change overnight.  Sign up at United Opt Out National for all the latest.
SNOHOMISH -- More than 550 Snohomish School District students did not take state exams in the past two weeks, a revolt staged by parents who question whether the tests are worth the money. The parents also hoped to get the attention of state lawmakers. 
With so many kids bowing out of the tests, the school district could lose some control for another year in how it spends federal funds given to schools with a large percentage of students who qualify for free and reduced lunches.  
The district most likely won't meet the federal requirement that at least 95 percent of students participate in the exams. 
So far, the students who didn't take the Measurement of Student Progress represent about 12 percent of the 4,501 students between third and eighth grade required to take the test in Snohomish. 
Last year only 12 students missed the standardized tests. 
The final tally could increase because students are scheduled to continue taking the tests until June 1. . . .

Sunday, May 06, 2012

Walking Man, Jesse Turner: "Arne Duncan, You're a Failure"

Any day you are feeling down and dispirited, just click back here and play Jesse Turner's beautiful harangue from the UOON's Occupy the DOE last month:


califather on livestream.com. Broadcast Live Free

Wednesday, April 18, 2012

Special Ed Child Forced to Take Test, Mom Threatened by School Officials in Oceanside, NY

If you had a child with special needs who struggled to learn and who was stressed out about the upcoming state test, would you consider opting out?  Christine Dougherty did in Oceanside, NY, and she notified the school.

She did not expect the reply she got, however, with a threatening rebuttal and an accusation of "educational neglect" --along with a threat by the principal, Mr. Capone, to call Child Protective Services if Joseph was opted out.

Then Mr. Capone, the principal, forced Christine's son, Joseph, to take the test without the conditions set out in his Individual Education Plan (IEP).

Below is the story in letters posted at UOO:
At United Opt Out National, we encourage opting out of high stakes testing because we support public schools. We support real learning and real teaching and a whole and equitable education for all children.  High stakes testing is not just any test – it is a test used to punish students, teachers, schools and communities.  It is a test that profits billionaires and neglects children – denying students real learning.  It is a test that is being used to privatize public education.  Also, we believe that everyone has a moral obligation to protect children from the harmful tactics currently being used by corporate education reformers – high stakes testing being only one of the tactics.

Yet – this particular tactic holds great weight.  We know that if everyone opts out of high stakes testing, they will not have the data to punish or profit.  Corporate education reformers know this as well – they NEED the data to continue dismantling the public schools – and this is exactly why they have put in place a system which places educators in fear of being fired, in fear of having their school shut down, if indeed, they do not get the data.  As a result, parents who try to opt a child out of the test are often bullied.

We wonder – where is mainstream “liberal” media?  Why are these stories being ignored?  Our public school system is being dismantled – and no one reports it.  Children suffer at the hands of high stakes testing – and no one reports it.  Read these letters.  Share them widely.

And answer this question regarding educational neglect.  Who is neglecting who?

PARENT LETTER
From: Christine Dougherty [mcadoug@aol.com]
Sent: Sunday, April 15, 2012 10:38 AM
To: Thomas M. Capone; Donna Gales
Subject: opt out.

Please be advised that my son Joseph Dougherty will not be taking the New York
State assessments on April 17-19 and April 25-27. After watching Joseph
struggle and listening to his concerns, we have decided to opt out of this
unnecessary testing.

I am requesting that Joseph be given an alternative real learning opportunity
option.

Christine Dougherty
mcadoug@aol.com

ADMINISTRATIVE RESPONSE
Dear Ms. Dougherty,

This letter is in response to your April 15, 2012 email and follows up today’s
telephone conversation. In your email, you requested that the Oceanside Union
Free School District (“District”) not administer the New York State English
Language Arts (“ELA”) and Math Assessments to your son, Joseph. During today’s
telephone conversation, you reiterated this request. Upon my informing you that
the State Assessments are not optional, you indicated that you planned to
either: (1) keep Joseph at home for the period during which the State
Assessments were administered, (2) keep Joseph at home for the portion of each
day during which the State Assessments were administered, or (3) send Joseph to
school with instructions not to take the State Assessments.

I remind you that, pursuant to the Regulations of the Commissioner of
Education, all public school students in grades three through six who have not
been deemed eligible by the CSE to take the Alternate Assessment, and are not
parentally placed on home instruction, must take the ELA and mathematics
elementary assessments. See 8 N.Y.C.R.R. §100.3(b)(2). As you know, Joseph
does not qualify for the Alternate Assessment. The Regulations contain no
“opt-out” provision, which would authorize a parent to have his or her child not
participate in the State Assessment. It is the District’s obligation to
determine all eligible students’ proficiency levels through the administration
of the State Assessments. As such, taking the State Assessments is mandatory
for Joseph.

If without medical justification, Joseph is absent from school on any day
during the Assessment period, the District will deem this absence as unexcused.
Further, if you keep Joseph home from school during the Assessment period,
without medical verification, it is within the District’s discretion to deem
these absences as indicia of educational neglect, which would leave the District
little choice but to contact Child Protective Services (“CPS”). Pursuant to the
New York State Education Department’s 2012 School Administrator’s Manual, a
student will receive a final score of “999″ and will be counted as “not tested”
if: (1) he is absent from the entire test; (2) he refuses the entire test; (3)
he is absent for any session; or (4) he is present for all sessions, but does
not respond to even one question on the test. Accordingly, if Joseph engages in
any one of these activities, he will receive a final score of 999, he will be
counted as not tested, he may receive an unexcused absence, and CPS may have to
be called.
If Joseph does not participate in the State Assessments, the
District will use other formal or informal assessments to determine his
proficiency level. If Joseph participates in the State Assessments, he will of
course be provided with his IEP-mandated accommodations.

I hope the above has clarified any outstanding questions you have about
Joseph’s obligation to participate in the State-mandated Assessments and your
obligation to make him available for testing. We look forward to having Joseph
participate in the State Assessments.

PARENT LETTER
Dear Mr. C:

I have referred your letter to my attorney. However, I have been advised and would like to take this opportunity to share with you the fact that parental rights are broadly protected by Supreme Court decisions (Meyer and Pierce), especially in the area of education. The Supreme Court has repeatedly held that parents posses the “fundamental right” to “direct the upbringing and education of their children.” Furthermore, the Court declared that “the child is not the mere creature of the State: those who nurture him and direct his destiny have the right coupled with the high duty to recognize and prepare him for additional obligations.” (Pierce v. Society of Sisters, 268 U.S. 510, 534-35) The Supreme Court criticized a state legislature for trying to interfere “with the power of parents to control the education of their own.” (Meyer v. Nebraska, 262 U.S. 390, 402.) In Meyer, the Supreme Court held that the right of parents to raise their children free from unreasonable state interferences is one of the unwritten “liberties” protected by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. (262 U.S. 399). In recognition of both the right and responsibility of parents to control their children’s education, the Court has stated, “It is cardinal with us that the custody, care and nurture of the child reside first in the parents, whose primary function and freedom include preparation for the obligations the State can neither supply nor hinder.” (Prince v.Massachusetts, 321 U.S. 158).
Since state law is superceded by Federal Law, parents are given the final say in matters of education and I shall have the final say in my son’s education.
[Christine's son, Joseph, was tested against his and his mom's wishes.]
PARENT LETTER
Joseph advises me that he was forced to take the assessment today against his wishes and mine in a separate location, thereby resulting in emotional and physical stress. He is now complaining of a headache and “knots in his back”.
Not only have you violated my parental rights, but now you are failing to implement my son’s IEP, which as you know is a legal document.

I specifically direct you to pages 11 and 12 of Joseph’s IEP (the testing accomodations section) wherein it states he is to begin exam in mainstream setting with significant proctor attention to reduce test anxiety.
While I do not feel the need to threaten you, I must advise you that should this situation occur again, I will be forced to contact the authorities.

Christine Dougherty

Friday, April 06, 2012

Arne Duncan, Let My People Go!

Occupy the Department of Education, sponsored by United Opt Out, took place in DC March 30 - April 2, 2012. The quantitative numbers were somewhat low for an Occupy protest but from a qualitative standpoint, the event was a huge success. Teachers, parents, concerned citizens and academics gathered for four straight days outside the DoED. They came from California, Colorado, Florida, Tennessee, Virginia, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, Oregon, Maryland, and elsewhere to stand up against the destructive education policies being perpetuated by the greedy corporate education reformers pushing more high stakes standardized testing, teacher evaluations based on test scores, charter schools, vouchers and the further privatization of public education.

The one thing protesters had in common was a desire to do what is right for their children, their students, and the freedom to do what they love, teach.

Jesse Turner, also known as "the walking man", railed at the building on Maryland Avenue where Arne Duncan sits. He asked those gathered outside, "What kind of country attacks its teachers?" Last summer, Turner made headlines when he walked from Connecticut to DC for the first Save Our Schools March and National Call to Action.

Despite the thousands of people who attended the march last summer and the hundreds who attended Occupy the DoED last week, the demand to end to punitive high stakes testing and the continuous drumbeat of attacks on public schools, teachers and education in general continues unabated and appears to be accelerating. The policies of this administration and Congress reflect the tight grip of corporations, foundations and business leaders whose hearts are hardened and minds are closed to the cries of the people suffering under the oppressive and unjust abuse of high stakes testing.

Like Pharoah, Duncan's heart is hardened and although members of United Opt Out met with him last week and he has heard the cries of the people, he refuses to let them go.

Tonight is Passover. President Obama will be sitting down to his seder at the White House and maybe Arne Duncan will be one of the guests. Integral to the seder are themes such as freedom, equality, social justice and hope. The evening begins with various rituals including asking the four questions.

This year, I have four questions I would like to ask President Obama and Arne Duncan:

1. How did civilization progress without high stakes standardized testing?

2. Why are students of the wealthy, like your own children, who attend the best private schools, exempt from the dehumanizing onslaught of fill in the bubble multiple choice tests if it is such a great way to assess learning?

3. In a country where 20 percent or more children are living in poverty, with little or no access to health care, dental care, good housing, and safe streets, wouldn't all the billions of dollars being spent on multiple choice tests and data collection be better spent on providing them with these basic needs so they could go to school ready to learn?

4. When is this madness going to end?


Monday, March 26, 2012

The Full Schedule for Occupy the DOE March 30-April 2

Be in DC this weekend! 
But if you can't, watch it all on LiveStream.  

Occupy the DOE in DC, Friday, March 30th: Take Our Message to Capitol Hill


10:00 a.m. Welcome Rally at the DOE!!!!  United Opt Out Administrators speak up:   Morna McDermott McNulty, Laurie Murphy,  Peggy Robertson, Tim Slekar and Ceresta Smith.  Why we are here and what we hope to accomplish – we plan to create a greater awareness of the negative effects of corporate education reform and share tools for action. We opt out of corporate education reform.

11:00 a.m. Mic-check: Share our stories, our dreams for public education and more.

Noon:  ALEC (American Legislative Exchange Council) awareness session by United Opt Out Administrators
1:30 p.m. March to Capitol Hill to share our demands.  Route/guidelines/permit for march to Capitol Hill can be found here. Map can be found here. We will share a copy of the Parental Rights Opt Out Bill (currently going to committee to allow a parent the right to opt a child out of the state test with no punitive consequences to the child, school or district) from Colorado – we suggest this bill become a model for opt out bills in every state.  This is a proclamation for issuing bills across the land; opting out needs to be protected in all fifty states. We will share our concerns regarding ALEC legislation, NCLB, RTTT and our demands for a public education system that provides a whole and equitable education for all children – without high stakes testing and punitive consequences for students, teachers, schools, communities and our democracy.

3:00 p.m. Appointment with Senator Sanders educational counsel, Jessica Cardichon.

4:00 p.m. Return to the DOE to continue our occupation.

9:30 p.m. at Saint Stephens with Bill Moyer of Backbone Campaign: Strategy, Conflict, & Creativity – Tools for Harmonizing Grassroots Power 
In the wake of a tumultuous Fall and in anticipation of a vibrant Spring how will the populist uprising manifest and draw new members to the cause? How can we build movement identity that is sympathetic and inviting? Overcoming obstacles, misconceptions, and confusion about the nature of conflict, the activist-organizer’s role in building movement power, and understanding grand strategic principles are essential if we are to deliver meaningful victories.

Occupy the DOE in DC, Saturday, March 31st: We OCCUPY the DOE
10:00 a.m. Wake Up Call – Join us in the morning to rally and mic-check at the DOE.  We want to hear your voice!!


11:00 a.m. Liza Campbell, teacher and education organizer in NYC and Brian Jones, teacher and co-narrator for the Inconvenient Truth about Waiting for Superman:  Building a Grassroots Movement to Defend Public Education
NYC public school teachers Liza Campbell and Brian Jones will describe their experiences fighting privatization, charter school co-locations, school closings and high-stakes standardized testing. These activists will share lessons from the struggle in New York, and discuss the challenges facing our movement today.


Brian Jones is a teacher, actor and activist in New York. He is the co-narrator of the film, The Inconvenient Truth Behind Waiting for Superman, and a contributing author to the new book, Education and Capitalism: Struggles for Learning and Liberation (Haymarket Books).



Liza Campbell is a teacher and education organizer in New York City. Currently she focuses her activism energy on building a movement of parents and teachers to fight high stakes testing, combating the school-to-prison pipeline while pushing for restorative alternatives, and occupying the New York City Department of Education. She teaches high school math.

1:30 p.m. – Linda Nathan, Ann O’Halloran, Ruth Rodriguez-Fay.  Getting Beyond the Madness of High-Stakes Testing: Occupy the Classroom!
Linda Nathan is the founding headmaster of the Boston Arts Academy, the city’s first and only public high school for the visual and performing arts. Dr. Nathan has written a widely-praised book about teaching and leadership in urban schools, “The Hardest Questions Aren’t on the Test,” which was recently published in Spanish. Ann O’Halloran was the 2007 Massachusetts History Teacher of the Year and is a member of Citizens for Public Schools.  Ruth Rodríguez-Fay (pictured here) is past President of Citizens for Public Schools and a “Save Our Schools” interim committee member.


2:30 Jim Horn:  KIPP and the Total Compliance Model of Schooling the Poor:  Ending the KIPP-nosis
Since 2000 when KIPP, Inc. presented a student skit at the Republican National Convention, thus making its debut onto the world political stage, this corporate charter franchise has attracted hundreds of millions of dollars to promote KIPP and the KIPP pedagogical model as the segregated, no-excuses solution to urban schooling. This presentation will share research on KIPP schools that tells a very different story than the one presented in the corporate media.  Also included will be excerpts from firsthand accounts of former teachers who taught within the KIPP organization and lived to tell about it.


Jim Horn is Associate Professor of Educational Leadership and Foundations at Cambridge College.  He also publishes and contributes to Schools Matter, a weblog devoted to the preservation and renewal of public education. He has close to four decades of experience as a K-12 educator and as professor of social foundations and research.  He publishes opinion pieces regularly in various venues, and he is committed to the social justice leadership mission in schools here and abroad.

3:30 p.m. Dave Greene:  The Inconvenient Truths behind TFA and its Inadequate Version of Teacher Training.
SUMMARY: Most CM’s (TFA teachers) are nice, well intentioned, upper middle class suburban white kids with no bicultural literacy. They usually see their two years as “community service” on the road to a “higher” calling. Many of them would make excellent teachers, if they stayed.

They, and we, are told they are the solution to the problems facing education. TFA propaganda is all we see. TFA is very good at marketing their product, which is not education; it is TFA.

TFA is the Emperor with no clothes. It’s time to tell the Emperor we see.

David Greene is a former Social Studies teacher and coach in NYC, Woodlands HS, and Scarsdale HS. He presently is a field supervisor for Fordham University, mentoring Teach For Americans in the Bronx. He is a staff member of WISE Services, an organization that helps high schools create and run experiential learning programs for seniors. He is an advisor to the Foundation For Male Studies and The Boy Initiative, a HS football coach, and was a member of the Save Our Schools Call to Action Conference and Rally Program Committee.

Mr. Greene co-presented a workshop on TFA at the SOS Conference last July. He has had work published in Ed Week on line and has also been referenced by Valerie Strauss in her Washington Post web based column, The Answer Sheet. He has given several talks on how NCLB and RTTP have negatively affected the success of boys in public schools. He is a regular contributor to The Teachers Talk Back Blog, was featured on “Bronx Talk”, blogs at his website, DCG Mentoring, and is still working on a book tentatively titled, So You Think You Know Education, A Teacher’s Perspective.

6:30 p.m. Movie – TEACH at American University 6:30 p.m. followed by a panel with Bob & Yvonne Lamothe, Ann O’Halloran,  and Ruth Rodriguez.
Location: American University, 4400 Massachusetts Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20016
http://www.teachdocumentary.com/film/teachpreviews.cfm

The TEACH documentary, TEACH, Teachers are Talking, Is the Nation Listening? is a film that features conversations about the art of teaching and learning by teachers themselves. We have interviewed over 40 teachers from many school districts including Boston, Brooklyn, NY, Madison, WI, Key West, FL, North Conway, NH, Cambridge, MA, Newton, MA, Lincoln-Sudbury,MA, and others. Additional parts of the movie include legislative hearings, speeches by Bradley Whitford, Diane Ravitch, and others, debates between union and school officials, various public hearings about school closings, and various teacher rallies. Recently we traveled to Wisconsin to take part in the rallies and document the multitude of happenings there to fight to protect their unions. We have interviews and many scenes from their recent protests there including the rally of more than 100,000 people on February 26.
Robert Lamothe and Yvonne Lamothe are teachers in the Boston Public Schools. Since we started this movie around 4 years ago we have become increasing concerned and dismayed by what has been happening to our schools and education in general. People are making decisions about our schools that don’t really know what they are doing and don’t have the interests of children and our schools as the determining factor in setting our education policies. The joys of learning and teaching are being destroyed by this terrible emphasis on testing and standards. We have become increasingly frustrated by the fact that very seldom do teachers voices get heard. Teachers who should be a leading part of education policy and “reform” are for the most part not part of the process, not part of the national and local debates.

Each day we hear about teaching and teachers through the eyes of administrators, politicians and business leaders. Public education in the US is under attack. Seldom is voice given to those dedicated and experienced teachers who work in our public schools.  Interviews with teachers from many school districts illuminate what’s happening to schools across the country, what is impacting their performance, and offers their analysis of the performance and purpose of the charter movement. This documentary hopes to give dignity and appreciation to the passion, commitment and insight of those who make the choice to devote their lives to educating all of our nation’s children.
As stated in the subtitle, Teachers are Talking, Is the Nation Listening. We hope to bring the voices and wisdom of teachers to the nation.

Sincerely,
Robert Lamothe and Yvonne Lamothe
Director / Producer
Film Our Way Films
http://www.filmourwayfilms.com


Occupy the DOE in DC, Sunday, April 1st – April Fools Day – We OCCUPY the DOE
April Fools!  No Child Left Behind – Fool Me Once.
Race to the Top – We Won’t be Fooled Again.

10:00 a.m. Wake Up Call – Join us in the morning to rally, mic-check and wake up America with our stories, our hopes and our demands!

11:00 a.m. – Jesse Turner:  Children More than Data

Jesse will discuss how the current NCLB/RTTT assessment framework is both unethical and unbalanced.  He wants to engage participants in an interactive dialogue – what does an Inclusive Balanced Assessment Framework look like? A balanced framework using authentic measures that values the voice of students, teachers, and parents is within our reach.
Dr. Jesse Turner is the Director of the Central Connecticut State University Literacy Center, teaching advanced clinical graduate courses for literacy specialists. As part of his department’s community engagement mission, the Literacy Center at CCSU provides over $130,000.00 worth of tutoring by certified teachers to local children, free of charge, every year. Dr. Turner works closely on a daily basis with children, parents, and teachers and is an activist and advocate for children, parents, and teachers. He has spoken to audiences across the nation about the problems created by the No Child Left Behind Act, In 2010 Jesse created the Facebook group “Children Are More Than Test Scores” as a way to connect individuals and communities struggling against the NCLB law. Two years ago Jesse walked 400 miles in 40 days from Connecticut to Washington, D.C. to raise awareness of the negative impact NCLB/RTTT was having on children, parents, teachers, and schools. With a core group of people he met on his walk, and online Jesse helped build the coalition that became the Save Our Schools March, and Week of Action. His work includes advocating for children, parents and teachers, chairing conferences, writing grants, and organizing community based projects.

1:30 p.m. – Mark Naison and Ira Shor: The Occupy Movement and the Struggle to Save Public Education in the United States
Mark and Ira will discuss the intense attack on public education while connecting it to larger policy campaigns in a class war underway in America. Further discussion will focus on the banning of Paulo Freire’s Pedagogy of the Oppressed in the MAS program at Tuscon.


Mark Naison is Professor of History and African American Studies at Fordham University. He is the author of four books and over 100 articles on African American politics, social movements and American culture and sports. Dr. Naison is the Principal Investigator of the Bronx African American History Project, one of the largest community based oral history projects in the nation and has begun work on an book of oral histories from the BAAHP, with Robert Gumbs, entitled Before the Fires: An Oral History of African American Life in the Bronx from the 1030’s to the 1960’s. His articles about Bronx music and Bronx culture have been published in German, Spanish, Catalan, and Portuguese as well as English. When not doing historical research, Naison likes to play tennis and golf, post commentary on his blog “With a Brooklyn Accent” and make periodic forays into the media. He has appeared on the O’Reilly Factor, the Discovery Channel’s Greatest American Competition (as Dr King’s advocate), and on the Dave Chappell Show, where his “performance” has been preserved on that show’s Second Year DVD. Most recently, he has begun presenting historical “raps” in Bronx schools under the nickname of “Notorious Phd” and was the subject of stories about his use of hip hop in teaching in the Daily News, and on Bronx 12 Cablevision, and Fox Business.

IRA SHOR works with Prof. Mark Naison of Fordham University on starting “99% clubs” affiliated with the Occupy movement. Shor is a Professor of Rhetoric/Composition at the City University of NY’s Graduate Center(Phd Program in English) and in the Dept. of English at the College of Staten Island/CUNY. Shor started the new doctorate in Rhetoric/Composition at the CUNY Grad Center in 1993. There, he directs dissertations and offers seminars in literacy, Paulo Freire and critical pedagogy, whiteness studies, composition theory and practice, and the rhetorics of domination and resistance. At the College of Staten Island/CUNY, he teaches first-year writing, non-fiction, coming-of-age narratives, multicultural literature, and mass media.

His 9 published books include a 3-volume set in honor of the late Paulo Freire, the noted Brazilian educator who was his friend and mentor: CRITICAL LITERACY IN ACTION(college language arts) and EDUCATION IS POLITICS(Vol 1, k-12, and Vol. 2, Postsecondary Across the Curriculum). Shor’s work with Freire began in the early 1980s and lasted until Freire’s unfortunate passing in 1997. He and Freire co-authored A PEDAGOGY FOR LIBERATION in 1986, the first “talking” book Freire published with a collaborator. Shor also authored the widely used EMPOWERING EDUCATION(1992) and WHEN STUDENTS HAVE POWER(1996), two foundational texts in critical teaching. His CRITICAL TEACHING AND EVERYDAY LIFE(1980)was the first book-length treatment of Freire-based critical methods in the North American context. That book grew out of Shor’s teaching for Open Admission students in the City University in the 1970s, where he helped build an experimental writing program recognized as one of three successful efforts in higher education. Coming to the CUNY in 1971 after a PhD at Wisconsin, he experimented with critical literacy, taught Basic Writing for 15 years, and now offers doctoral courses.

Born into a working-class family in 1945 in the South Bronx of New York City, Shor attended mediocre local public schools until he was selected for the premier public high school then in the nation, New York City’s Bronx High School of Science. There, he saw how differently education for the elite is managed compared to the education for the majority he took part in before. In the Jewish South Bronx of the 1950s, he grew up in a rent-controlled apartment among Eastern European families, his being Russian. Shor’s father, a son of immigrants, became a sheet-metal worker after he dropped out of school at 15. He learned his trade from a family friend; during World War II and the Korean War, he built battleships and aircraft carriers at the old Brooklyn Navy Yard. Shor’s mother, also first-generation, was a bookkeeper for small businesses who finished high school but could not afford to go to college, which broke her heart.

After graduating from Bronx Science High School, Shor attended the University of Michigan(BA, English, 1966), then the University of Wisconsin(MA, 1968, and Phd, 1971), both sites of vigorous student activism in the 1960s. Shor joined the antiwar, civil rights, and students’ rights movements of that time. His dissertation was on Kurt Vonnegut whose fiction stood for equality, peace, and kindness. After finishing his Phd, Shor started teaching comp and basic writing at Staten Island Community College, then a 2-year unit of CUNY. He joined the CUNY faculty when the democratic policies of Open Admissions and Free Tuition were under attack. Shor joined the long defense of democratic rights at CUNY, 1971-1976, while also experimenting with critical literacy for his working-class students. He worked with Paulo Freire in the 80s and 90s, when Freire and he co-authored A Pedagogy for Liberation.

2:30 p.m. – The Education of Sam Sanders with author Thomas S. Poetter
Set in 2029, The Education of Sam Sanders tells the story of an 8th grader searching for meaning in his school experiences. In a public school system beset by the finality and rigidity of standardized tests and curriculums, Sam Sanders, with the help of his teacher and mother, defies the system and creates something new: a curriculum that enlightens rather than categorizes students. In this hopeful yet frightening look at an educational future not too far from our own, we encounter the high cost of inquiry-oriented learning and the even higher cost of a system that suppresses it.  The Education of Sam Sanders is a valuable book for young adults in schools, students of teaching, teachers, and parents/citizens concerned by current trends in public education. This inspiring work offers a unique and in-depth analysis of the high stakes testing and standardization movements and surfaces ideas for how we might change our current direction.

Thomas S. Poetter is a Professor of Curriculum Studies in the Department of Educational Leadership at Miami University, Oxford, Ohio.  A longtime public school advocate and partner, Poetter continues to write and teach with remarkably talented,focused students and colleagues at Miami in the areas of curriculum, teaching, and public education renewal.  Among his many published journal articles and books is his recent edited book with doctoral students, 10 Great Curricula:  Lived Conversations of Progressive, Democratic Curriculum in School and Society (2011, Information Age Publishers).   He can be reached at poettets@muohio.edu.



3:30 p.m. – Stephen Krashen
Is American Education Backing the Wrong Horse? (Yes)

The movement for national standards and tests is based on these claims: (1) Our educational system is broken, as revealed by US students’ scores on international tests; (2) We must improve education to improve the economy; (3) The way to improve education is to have national standards and national tests that enforce the standards, and rate teachers on the basis of student performance (value-added measures). Each of these claims is unfounded. Dr. Krashen will discuss each claim and how to refute it. And – Stephen has a solution – join us to hear more.
Stephen Krashen is Emeritus Professor of Education at the University of Southern California. He is best known for developing the first comprehensive theory of second language acquisition, introducing the concept of sheltered subject matter teaching, and as the co-inventor of the Natural Approach to foreign language teaching. He has also contributed to theory and application in the area of bilingual education, and has done important work in the area of reading. He holds a PhD in Linguistics from UCLA, was the 1977 Incline Bench Press champion of Venice Beach and holds a black belt in Tae Kwon Do. He is the author of The Power of Reading (Heinemann, 2004, second edition). His recent papers can be found at http://www.sdkrashen.com.


7:30 to 9:30 p.m. Bus Boys & Poets:   Barry Lane Cabaret
Location: Cullen Room @ Busboys and Poets, 5th & K

Barry Lane is an author, teacher, comedian and singer.  Barry’s Cabaret celebrates teachers.  He states: These are difficult times for teachers.  There are serious issues in educational accountability and instruction raised by the new Common Core Standards. There are one-size-fits-all bubble tests that rank teachers.  There are politico-pundits who blame teachers for all the problems of public education. Time to forget about all that, let your hair down, and concentrate on what’s real.  Time to DANCE, LAUGH, SING.
After years of doing stand-up and parody karaoke singing as part of his academic presentations, Barry Lane has put together a genuine interactive, improvisational, nightclub act for teachers. You will sing, you will dance and you will learn to laugh at yourself and the crazy world around you.  You may also begin to realize once again, that you have the most important job in the world.

Occupy the DOE in DC, MONDAY, April 2nd – Let’s Bring Real Learning to the White House: Real Hope. Real Solutions.

9:00 a.m. Join us at the DOE – Poster Making Party, Mic-check and more.

10:00 a.m. Solutions for Communities – Mike Klonsky:  “This is how we do it: Parents Organizing to Save Our Schools”

Michael Klonsky, Ph.D. is on the education faculty at DePaul University in Chicago. He currently serves as the national director of the Small Schools Workshop and is a member of the National Steering Committee of Save Our Schools (SOS).  Dr. Klonsky is a teacher educator who has spoken and written extensively on school reform issues with a focus on urban school restructuring. He is also the parent of three children who have been educated in Chicago’s public schools.  His latest book (with Susan Klonsky), Small Schools: Public School Reform Meets the Ownership Society (Routledge), is a critique of top-down school reform and the push towards privatization of public schools. He is also the author of Small Schools: The Numbers Tell a Story (University of Illinois Small Schools Workshop) and co-author of A Simple Justice: The Challenge for Teachers in Small Schools (Teachers College Press).  He has served as a member of the National Advisory Council on Youth Violence and is past president of the board of Catalyst, Chicago’s school-reform journal. He has also written extensively on the history and progress of Chicago’s school reform movement and has assisted teachers, parents, and community groups in efforts to save, rethink, and transform their public schools.

His work is profiled at http://klonsky.blogspot.com/
His SmallTalk blog can be found at http://michaelklonsky.blogspot.com/
His Schooling in the Ownership Society blog is at http://schoolingintheownershipsociety.blogspot.com/
mail: smallschoolsworkshop@yahoo.com

11:00 a.m. Solutions for Educators – Bess Altwerger, Morna McDermott McNulty and Peggy Robertson (more info. to follow):  Professional Schools of Conscience for Educators and the Declaration by Ken Goodman

12:30 p.m. March to the White House – Share Real Learning…..Real Assessment….Real Teaching…Real Democracy.  Solutions for the 99% – Not Profit for the 1%.
Tell Me What Real Learning Looks Like?  This is What Real Learning Looks Like!!!
Share our DEMANDS.
Mic-Check – Share our stories from students, teachers, parents and community members.  Let’s tell them what we know about quality learning and teaching.  Let’s tell them what we demand in return.  Let’s share our posters – our visuals of real teaching and learning. Bring student work, bring STUDENTS!!!  Bring instruments (hand held), art displays, history, science and math projects (on poster displays that can be hand held) – let’s share quality learning experiences. Our children are more than a test score. Our teachers are not robots reading a script.  Let’s bring it the White House and let them see.

Return to the DOE where we pass the torch to Save Our Schools:  A national movement dedicated to saving, rethinking and transforming public schools. 

4:00 p.m.  Save Our Schools Steering Committee members announce the next action.  (current steering committee members attending: Don Bartalo, Peggy Robertson, Ceresta Smith and Jesse Turner)