"A child's learning is the function more of the characteristics of his classmates than those of the teacher." James Coleman, 1972

Monday, November 23, 2009

Obama, Duncan, Gates Ed Head

[Photo taken from streaming video at White House Live]
"Hello President Obama, great speech you just gave there. I'm Vicki Phillips, head of the Gates Domestic Education Program (but you already knew that!). Hey, how are all the former Gates employees doing at the DOE? I was just chatting with my good friend, Mr. Aw-Shucks Duncan, and we had this really great idea: how about if we just get rid of all the teachers and use robots?! They wouldn't complain about the tests we're ramming down students' throats, they don't bitch about poor work environments, and they're practically FREE! Heck, that's practically our plan right now - did you see the revamped Get Schooled website? Once again, we left the teaching profession off the list of potential jobs of the future. We wouldn't want students aspiring to become teachers."

NCTE Wins Its Own Doublespeak Award for LEARN Dissembling?

From Susan Ohanian and Steve Krashen:
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:

The NCTE gives The Doublespeak Award annually to those "who have perpetuated language that is grossly deceptive, evasive, euphemistic, confusing, or self-centered." Previous winners include George W. Bush, Newt Gingrich, Rush Limbaugh, Exxon, the National Rifle Association, and the Tobacco Industry.

NCTE deserves the award for its document, "The LEARN Act and NCTE," signed by NCTE's Executive Director and the Director of the NCTE Office in Washington. The LEARN Act would spent 2.35 billion on literacy programs that spanning birth to grade 12. NCTE voiced its strong support of LEARN and urged NCTE members to support it as well. The article responded to criticism of NCTE's position and easily meets each of the requirements of Doublespeak:

It is grossly deceptive: In response to the claim that the LEARN Act involves too much testing, the NCTE article points out that LEARN includes formative testing, but only mentions in passing that LEARN will also include all the other dreaded and unnecessary uses of testing. In other words, they argue that because one kind of testing is ok, all the others can be included as well. Nor is it clear that formative testing done by outsiders is a good idea; see comments by J. Lucido, following the prize-winning NCTE paper (sources below).

It is evasive: Critics have pointed out that LEARN assumes that direct instruction is the only path to literacy development. The NCTE paper asks us not to worry, there will be no phonics in high school, evading the question of whether intensive phonics should be included anywhere, whether direct instruction is the only path, and ignoring the evidence that shows that literacy competence is largely acquired through reading, not through direct instruction.

It is also evades all research showing the powerful effect of libraries on children's reading ability and literacy development in general, noting only that the word "library" does in fact occur in the LEARN act.

The NCTE evaded all direct mention of the criticisms of its position, denying readers the chance to read the original statement and judge for themselves as to the validity of the points made as well as the accuracy of NCTE's characterization of these points (see below for locations of all relevant documents).

It is euphemistic, in that it uses the term LEARN Act without criticism or comment. The LEARN Act has nothing to do with learning.

It is confusing, in that it comes from NCTE, an organization that has, in the past, opposed the very points that the LEARN Act emphasizes.

It is self-centered. NCTE is clearly proud of its association with LEARN and with the fact that they were invited by a US Senator to approve of LEARN, along with a number of other groups. They suggest that they (in contrast to critics) have taken LEARN "seriously," a strange conclusion given that NCTE has ignored important research that has obvious relevance to the LEARN Act and its methods.

Sources:

NCTE. 2009. Ask Your Senator to Cosponsor S. 2740, the LEARN Act. http://www.ncte.org/action/alerts/learn

Krashen, S. 2009. The LEARN Act: Reading First on Steroids. http://www.ncte2008.ning.com/profiles/blogs/the-learn-act-reading-first-on

Cambridge, B. and Williamson, K. 2009. The LEARN Act and NCTE. http://www.ncte2008.ning.com/forum/topics/the-learn-act-and-ncte.

— Stephen Krashen & Susan Ohanian
News Release


2009-11-22

Alabama Concerned About Charter School Segregation: Massachusetts Goes Full Ahead

As the pressure to bow to the bribes heats up in the Obama/Gates/Broad Race Over the Cliff, states like Alabama without charter laws are feeling the pressure from the Oligarchs to open their doors to "innovation." So far charter schools have brought us innovations like more scripted teaching, uncertified or undercertified teachers with lower pay and no job security, the elimination of libraries, no food service or transportation or athletics, no like art or music, the undermining of public school funding, and a hearty embrace of apartheid schooling. Now that's what Sam Walton would call innovation!

As states like Massachusetts under a black Dem governor move forward with plans to make sure that more charter chain gangs are opened in poor neighborhoods to control and contain the minority populations, states like Alabama under a white Republican governor are actually taking the time to ask if charter schools could benefit anyone outside the corporatocracy, while bringing real harm to the civil rights gains of the past 5o years. Not only that, but there is at least one newspaper in Alabama, unlike in Boston, that includes news stories that express these reservations so that the citizens may make an informed decision about charters.

And so I salute the Montgomery Advertiser, which published "Push for Charter Schools Sparks Segregation Concerns:"
. . . .“I think superintendents would be willing to look at and explore what possibilities there are,” he said. “But what I’m afraid of is that if we rush this we will write a bad law that basically creates a dual system.”

The re-segregation of schools has been one of the most voiced concerns when it comes to charter schools. And a new report from The Civil Rights Project at the University of California Los Angeles has enumerated those concerns. The project has made an ongoing study of charter schools and the lack of civil rights policy concerning them. The report, “Equity Overlooked: Charter Schools and Civil Rights Policies,” [Equity Overlooked: Charter Schools and Civil Rights Policy] finds that charter schools can raise the danger of further escalating the re-segregation of public schools, a phenomenon that is already taking place in traditional public schools in the South.

The authors of the report, Erica Frankenberg and Genevieve Siegel-Hawley, write that, “Tying education stimulus dollars eligibility to charter numbers unfairly pressures states to ramp up efforts to authorize and open charter schools without considering the impact on racial and economic segregation.”

. . . .

Funding charter schools also is another hot-button issue. Former Booker T. Washington Magnet High School principal and current state Sen. Quinton Ross, D-Montgomery, said he attended Riley’s education symposium, where U.S. Education Secretary Arne Duncan spoke about Race to the Top and how charter schools would be a prerequisite to access those funds.

While Race to the Top no longer has that same emphasis, Ross said he knows it’s important to the Obama administration. But he’s not sure if the state is financially ready to have charter schools.

“When you think of charter schools, they can be another innovative way of delivering education,” he said. “But you have to keep in mind that there are many things draining our education dollars. We could open the door to fund these types of initiatives (charter schools), so that we can access these Race to the Top funds, but just like the stimulus money this money is going to go away.”

Ross, who is also on both the Senate’s education committees, said when the federal money runs out, it will be up to the state to pay for its charter schools and they could be in the same situation that many of the state’s initiatives are in now — strapped for cash.

In addition, Ross said charter schools typically handle their own finances and school districts would essentially be turning over the dollars they’re allocated and held responsible for to these schools with little, if any, say in how that money is spent. He said if a charter school closes down because of financial mismanagement or because it doesn’t have the resources to stay open, that’s state money that disappears.

Sunday, November 22, 2009

Imagine in Fort Wayne

Dennis Bakke and his pals at Imagine Schools are looking to get their hands on yet another piece of real estate in Ft. Wayne, Indiana. Ralph White, a TaeKwonDo instructor and operator of Parnell Poker Palace (a "charity casino"), signed a contract with the East Allen County Schools in 2006 that allowed him to use one of the district's empty buildings for various purposes, including child care and his TaeKwonDo training.
Now, White wants to turn the property over to Imagine Schools, and, presumably, one of their various for-profit real estate companies. But that messy contract he signed in 2006 is standing in the way, at least for now.
Part of that contract grants EACS first right to purchase the school for $1, although White claims he doesn't remember signing this five year agreement, but he also acknowledges signing it (someone's mighty confused). "It's just a little page that says something about five years," claims White. Now THAT'S the kind of disregard for legality that jives with Bakke and Imagine Schools!
From the Journal Gazette:

Rally for 3rd Imagine school pushes petitioning EACS

Kelly Soderlund
The Journal Gazette

About 50 people attended a rally Saturday to support Imagine Schools opening a third charter school at the former Village Woods Middle School, many of them connected to the movement.

White’s School of the Arts Community Developmental Programs, which occupies the former East Allen County Schools middle school, is garnering support to petition EACS to turn over the building so Imagine Schools Inc. can open a charter school. Thirty of the 50 people in attendance either worked for White’s School of the Arts or Imagine Schools.

Ralph White, who founded the community organization, said he had been given the building, 2700 E. Maple Grove Ave., by East Allen County School in 2006. He said he signed a contract that stated if he wanted to sell the building, the school district must be given the first right to buy it for $1 or refuse it.

White said he originally signed a contract that said the district had first dibs for only three years, but he also admitted signing a document giving East Allen purchasing rights for five years.

White is challenging the five-year concept and said he’s had the building in his possession for almost four years, so East Allen should call it even and relinquish its rights.

“I was so excited during that time, and it’s my fault, but I really didn’t remember signing a five-year deal,” White said. “It’s just a little page that says something about five years.”

Those who attended the rally were given pamphlets about White’s School of the Arts and Imagine Schools and were asked to sign a letter that will be given to the East Allen board. Supporters plan to attend the board meeting at 6:30 p.m. Tuesday at nearby Village Elementary, but the issue is not on the agenda.

Ultimately, the district board will decide how it wants to handle ownership of the property.

...

Continued here.
And, just for an added dose of insanity, here's a clip from an earlier Journal Gazette article about Mr. White's "charity casino":
White’s School of the Arts Community Development Programs first applied for a casino license but was denied because educational organizations do not fit into categories qualified for charity gambling licenses, said Larry Delaney, the commission’s assistant director. But a separate organization, White’s School of the Arts, did qualify and was granted a license on Dec. 18.
I don't think running a casino qualifies as innovation...

Saturday, November 21, 2009

Barr Resigns as Chairman of Green Dot, Going National

Green Dot founder Steve Barr has resigned as chairman of the charter chain. Alexander Russo claims Barr will go national by starting Green Dot America this coming January, an idea mentioned in the infamous New Yorker article. Interestingly, Russo also reports on the $50,866 Barr owes Green Dot, allegedly for "wining and dining teachers and funders," and Barr also claims the audit is not connected to his departure. Barr's announcement isn't really a departure - he'll retain a position on the executive board and become chairman emeritus.

The Dailiy Breeze claims a Green Dot announcement said Barr will focus on "broad education policy issues."

Would it be fair to say "Broad education policy issues," too?

Friday, November 20, 2009

Graduation for All Act of 2009

Introduced today by House Democrats, the Graduation for All Act of 2009 would create a $2 billion grant program from middle and high school turnarounds. While the details are still vague, the website of the Committee on Education and Labor pushes the idea of school turnarounds by allowing a school district to choose from an appropriately mis-named "Model of Success" list, ranging from "transformation to restarting the school as a charter." It's no wonder DFER's President Joe Williams, one of hedge fund trader Whitney Tilson's many puppets, sent out a cheery letter supporting the bill. It's certainly the kind of message pro-charter/voucher crowd likes to hear.

Keep this in mind: the Race to the Top fund is a $4.65 billion pot of cash. For just a chance to win some of this money (and there will be many losers), the whole education establishment is expected to dance willingly to the tune of the oligarchs, private foundations, and corporate interests.

Meanwhile, President Obama is mulling the deployment of 40,000 troops to Afghanistan. That'd cost and additional $40-54 billion per year.

Thursday, November 19, 2009

Edison-Operated School Receiving $460,053 from DOE

In what is certainly yet another sign of "truthiness in education," the Department of Education is handing out nearly 500k to Edison Learning, probably the only charter operator that could challenge Imagine Schools in a contest of pure corruption and greed. Pathway Academy, a K-8 charter school operated by Edison, is the official recipient of this grant, but, just like their Imagine peers, there are plenty of ways for privatizers to wrangle a few bucks out of public education by using non-profits as fronts for their schemes.
One can only hope this isn't the beginning of Duncan's replication plan for the "good" charters...
Three St. Louis charter schools get federal grants
St. Louis Post-Dispatch

The U.S. Department of Education has awarded more than $2 million in Charter Schools Program grants to four new Missouri charter schools.

In St. Louis, Shearwater High School, St. Louis Collegiate and Jamaa Learning Center — all slated to open this fall — received three-year grants of more than $500,000 each.

Pathway Academy of Kansas City got $460,053. Pathway, a K-8 school, opened in August. It is managed by EdisonLearning and sponsored by the University of Missouri-Kansas City.

The grants aim to help leaders in planning, program design and opening their schools.

Shearwater High School, focused on dropout recovery and prevention, received $647,541. Shearwater will be sponsored by St. Louis University.

Jamaa Learning Center, a K-8 community school, received $703,266. Jamaa is set to open in the Ville neighborhood of north St. Louis.

St. Louis Collegiate, a college-prep middle and high school, received $524,693. It hopes to serve the Baden neighborhood in north St. Louis.

Wednesday, November 18, 2009

Gates to Announce $500 Million in Bribes

In the coming days, the Gates Foundation will officially announce the winners of their $500 million bribe to school districts willing to revamp the teaching profession to improve "teacher effectiveness." In Memphis, for example, Gates allegedly will provide $90 million with the school district ponying up $36 million and local philanthropists chipping in additional $3 million. Pittsburgh Public Schools supposedly has been offered $40 million, with a school board vote scheduled for 6pm tonight. The Hillsborough County School Board (FL) voted yesterday to accept Gates' $100 bribe to change how teachers are "recruited, retained, rewarded and tenured" according to Gates spokesman Chris Williams. The Omaha Public Schools and Gates Foundation developed a $115 million plan to revamp the teaching profession "in part by tying performance to teacher pay" (with the unstated assumption that student achievement = test scores), but OPS withdrew their bid when the couldn't come up with $65 million from the local community (ahem...did anyone bother to ask Bill's buddy, the Oracle of Omaha?). The final potential recipient is a yet-to-be-named group of Los Angeles charter schools...
The Gates Foundation's reliance on and support of high-stakes testing and willingness to use testing data to define good teaching turns "teacher effectiveness" and "student achievement" into Orwellian language where all semblances of critique and thought collapse. One can only wonder exactly how these new teacher evaluation programs will be executed.

Michelle Rhee: Let's Go to the Videotape

Let's hope the judges in the Rhee case will have a look at this video as they consider the lawsuits, those that have been filed and the dozens yet to come. The choicest clip, among many, comes near the end, with Councilman and Rhee backer, Jack Evan, as arrogant bastard who cares not about the the intent of the law he is sworn to defend:
I don't believe that she overhired with the intent of firing teachers she didn't want there. I don't think that's what happened, and even if it did, so what? . . .
From the NewsHour, reported by John Merrow:

Hungry? No Excuses. Don't know English? No Excuses

Next year will mark 30 years since the Reagan team came to Washington and began the roll back on civil and human rights gains of the previous two decades. When it became apparent, in fact, that the attempt to close the U. S. Department of Education would fail, the Reagan team shifted its focus to, instead, utilizing the Department's resources to move the education and social agenda away from equity issues and toward a definition of excellence based on test scores, which, of course, is a system of rewards based on family income and wealth. And thus began a generation of classist and racist school testing reforms masked as a meritocracy, a false meritocracy that makes poverty invisible while grinding the poor under the heels of the well-heeled.

And the longer the educational genocide continues against the poor, the angrier we become at the poor, so much so that we saw the President exhorting the poor last summer at the 100th Conference of the NAACP in a way that sounded more like George Wallace than Martin Luther King:
“No one has written your destiny for you,” he said, directing his remarks to “all the other Barack Obamas out there” who might one day grow up to be president. “Your destiny is in your hands, and don’t you forget that. That’s what we have to teach all of our children! No excuses! No excuses!”
Mr. Obama did not acknowledge, of course, that his own destiny that was handed over to him included a Harvard legacy seat as a result of his father's Harvard alum status, or that he grew up in relative prosperity in a safe neighborhood with food and doctors and leafy suburban schools and a mother whose privileges included her whiteness.

(Click chart to enlarge: from WaPo). And so it was that the President seemed no less surprised than the rest of us that his U. S. Department of Agriculture released a report on Monday that showed 1 in 5 children in America hungry--and these numbers are from late 2008, before the effects of the Wall Street heist set in:

In 2008, the report found, nearly 17 million children -- more than one in five across the United States -- were living in households in which food at times ran short, up from slightly more than 12 million youngsters the year before. And the number of children who sometimes were outright hungry rose from nearly 700,000 to almost 1.1 million.

Among people of all ages, nearly 15 percent last year did not consistently have adequate food, compared with about 11 percent in 2007, the greatest deterioration in access to food during a single year in the history of the report.

Here are a few other relevant notations from Kristof's NYTimes column on Nov. 4:
. . . .The United States ranks 31st in life expectancy (tied with Kuwait and Chile), according to the latest World Health Organization figures. We rank 37th in infant mortality (partly because of many premature births) and 34th in maternal mortality. A child in the United States is two-and-a-half times as likely to die by age 5 as in Singapore or Sweden, and an American woman is 11 times as likely to die in childbirth as a woman in Ireland.

. . . . Yet another study, cited in a recent report by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and the Urban Institute, looked at how well 19 developed countries succeeded in avoiding “preventable deaths,” such as those where a disease could be cured or forestalled. What Senator Shelby called “the best health care system” ranked in last place.

The figures are even worse for members of minority groups. An African-American in New Orleans has a shorter life expectancy than the average person in Vietnam or Honduras.
And yet the Reagan education agenda of defining opportunity based on wealth continues unabated. In fact, the First Lady this week offered her own mixed message to poor immigrant children in Colorado:
Speaking to a student who had asked whether it's fair to use test scores to measure schools when some students don't speak English well, Mrs. Obama said the tests are "part of the system" and can't be avoided.

"You can fight the tests, or you can work with them and turn them into an advantage," she said.
So, then, Mrs. Obama, there is nothing we can do as a society about the testocracy we have created, but there is something that children can do to turn these abusive and unethical sorting instruments into "an advantage."

Please do say more about that, because I do not know and I do not know anyone who knows what you are talking about. What we do know, if we were to believe the stupidity to which you subscribe, is that all the poor, black, brown, immigrant, and disabled children in America will be proficient in reading and math by 2014, which is a full year ahead of your husband's pledge to eliminate hunger in America by 2015. Perhaps we should set that proficiency target back by a year so the two will coincide, and then we can have one big celebration together.