Felon-in-Chief and Freedom 250 Wire Fraud

 

The definition of wire fraud: " . . . fundraisers including O’Rourke misled prospective America250 donors by providing them with Freedom 250’s banking and routing numbers instead." www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026...

[image or embed]

— James Horn (@schools-matter24.bsky.social) July 2, 2026 at 8:42 AM

Texas Taliban Mandates Bible and Bill Bennett in Schools

Texas has a long history of repeated attempts to turn the public school curriculum into an indoctrination tool in support of Christofascist values promoted by the John Birch Society of the late 1950s—which had such profound influence on Barry Goldwater, Ronald Reagan, and the MAGAts that are now seeking to replace our constitutional republic with a fascist theocracy. 

The recent approval of a mandated book list for all K-12 Texas public school children is the latest, most brazen, and stupidest version of those many attempts to mold the next generation toward acceptance of the intellectual, ethical, religious, and social values of the late Jim Crow Era.

The religious indoctrination effort is underpinned by an unprecedented requirement for specified Protestant bible readings and/or bible lessons through elementary and high school.

The ethical training component comes in the form of required reading of neocon hypocrite, racist, and admitted habitual gambler, Bill Bennett, whose Book of Virtues and Children’s Book of Virtues serve as texts. (For some background on Bennett, see "The Bookie of Virtue" by Joshua Green writing for the Washington Monthly.)

Almost ten percent of all U.S. public school children attend Texas public schools.  Therefore, textbook companies are quick to yield to the monetary incentive to offer texts nationally that will sell in Texas as well. So if you think the retro pablum in the Texas required list of books will be limited to Texas, think again. 

By the way, the only significant differences between the new Texas requirements and what I was expected to read in school (1955-1967): we did not have a right-wing gambling addict teaching us ethical know-how, we didn’t have to read the bible (Protestant or otherwise), and we DID get to read Romeo and Juliet in 11th grade.  

Worldwide Movement Underway to Protect Schoolchildren from AI

A strong article here at The Guardian. 

Some of the science noted in the piece:

. . . neuroscience and education experts argue that rather than help students learn, AI can cause “cognitive off-loading”, meaning using an external aid to avoid mental effort.

A study published in 2025 in the journal Societies found that people ages 17 to 25 “exhibited higher dependence on AI tools and lower critical thinking scores compared to older participants”.

Stanford University reported in March that there was little evidence on how AI impacts K-12 education and that it’s unclear whether AI is “helping students complete tasks or helping them develop durable learning and skills”.

AI “was never designed to be a learning tool”, said Jared Cooney Horvath, a neuroscientist who has linked the recent nationwide decrease in test scores to increased screen time. “The tool an expert uses to make his or her life easier is not the tool a novice could use to learn how to become an expert. When they use the same tool, they don’t learn anything.” . . . .

Margaret Spellings Rides Again!

That’s right—the cowgirl is back, with a whole new look but with the same old discredited education policy that she started hawking 30 years ago with her Texas sidekick, then-Governor, George W. Bush.

Spellings has become the point person for the political and corporate dinosaurs who have never relented from a mission to profiteer and privatize schools and, now it seems, are renewing their efforts to finish off public education with even more of the same high-stakes standardized tests that continue to be used even today in almost every state.

So as a reminder of the wreckage that Spellings oversaw beginning the late 1990s, here is a post from just before the 2008 presidential election:

Special Comment: Margaret Spellings

October 27, 2008

Margaret Lamontagne Spellings has come a long way from her humble beginnings as a legislative activist paid to hector public education supporters in the Texas Legislature. With a bachelor's degree in poli-sci and a teaching resume that is limited to a single stint as tutor on education issues to a distinctively non-curious George the Governor of Texas, she has risen to represent the neocon ruling model that insists upon political fealty above competence, ruthlessness over morality, ideology above truth, private aggrandizement over the public good.

With her fellow NCLB designer Sandy Kress working under the watchful eye of Karl Rove, who previously hired her to tutor the Governor, these core miseducators put together the infrastructure for an education bill aimed to achieve the conservative goals of education privatization, even without the school vouchers that unsuspecting Democrats strutted about getting stripped from the NCLB Act.

As Elizabeth Debray has documented, Spellings and the inner circle knew that the impossible 100 percent proficiency targets would accomplish over time what conservatives would have preferred to get done with the imposition of vouchers on the front end of the Bush reign. Rather than immediate conservative gratification, the Spellings testing requirements offered the kind of torturous schooling, a pedagogical variety of slow-motion waterboarding, that would eventually break down the will of teachers and public school supporters, thus opening up the market for the tutoring corporations, the charter profiteers, and the non-profit corporate brainwashing outfits like KIPP.

Now at the end of the Spellings reign of terror and half-way to the 2014 Judgment Day, 4 out of 10 public schools in America are on her NCLB failure list. Special ed children and English language learners who can't read the test questions are tested right along with the rest, including millions of children disabled by poverty. The poorest neighborhoods, in fact, are commanded to perform at the same level as the schools in the leafy suburbs. No excuses. And no extra resources, either.

Since NCLB became law in 2002, Bush budgets have underfunded NCLB by nearly $90 billion dollars (pdf). Head Start has been cut back by 11 percent. Career education programs, educational technology, and other programs like Reading is Fundamental have been zeroed out in Bush budgets. While cynically demanding that special ed students perform at the same levels as other students, $30 billion has been cut from the authorized amount in the 2004 IDEA Improvement Act. In short, the poor, the disabled, and the immigrant children have been sacrificed to make an ideological case against public schools and for vouchers and charters (even as research shows they are no better at producing test scores than the schools they would replace.

Recently when fielding a question concerning the burgeoning number of schools not making the AYP (Adequate Yearly Progres) cut, Mrs. Spellings limply responded with "pretty much every organization needs improvement." Yes, you are correct, Mrs. Spellings, and "pretty much every organization" accepts this fact, except yours, it seems. Pretty much every other organization does not face closure or reconstitution or some other form of demolition if the organization does not reach a level of improvement that is impossible to attain.

As a result of your manipulation, Mrs. Spellings, it is now the public school organization that has lost its most ethical and imaginative professionals on the road to "improvement." It is now only the public school organization that, in seeking the impossible, has had its purposes hijacked so that relevance, caring, and humane values have been extinguished along the way to the unreachable. It is now only the public school organization, Mrs. Spellings, that has so focused on unattainable improvements that children have become alienated prisoners in an institution that blames them for the failure that you, Mrs. Spellings, have created. It is only the public school organization whose resources have been reduced while your scheduled impossible demands have been racheted up (even though there is no level of funding that would make the 100% proficiency goal achievable). It is only the public school organization, Mrs. Spellings, whose most vulnerable and needy member units have been cynically sacrificed on the ideological altar of privatization, even as the empty rhetoric of rescue has been unceasing from your lips.

So yes, Margaret, if I may call you Margaret, we are in agreement: "pretty much every organization needs improvement," including, I will add in caps, YOUR OWN. I would argue, in fact, that your organization "pretty much" needs an entire makeover. The good news is that your imminent departure, along with your reluctant former pupil, will make that improvement possible. Perhaps, then, we can get on the road to the real work of public school improvement, rather than the ceaseless undercutting of "pretty much" the entire system. I am sure that the competent and hard working civil servants at the Department of Education will be glad to see you off.

The Forests, Humanity’s Close Cousins

 I watched a segment of NOVA on PBS this week, and I have been thinking a lot about this research finding shared in this clip from the transcript:

NARRATOR: In the soil around their roots, trees and plants cultivate microbes to break down the minerals they need and to fight off harmful bacteria. Just as we rely on microbes in our guts to digest our food, plants also need a healthy microbiome, the rhizosphere that surrounds their roots.

GEORGE MONBIOT: The rhizosphere might lie outside the plant, but it’s the plant’s external gut. And to make this comparison even spookier, of the thousand or so phyla of bacteria, the major groups, there are four that dominate in the rhizosphere, and there are four that dominate in the human gut. And they’re the same four.

It’s probably spookiest to those who consider humans far removed from what goes on inside the forest community.

Nipping the Bot Bud

For all the bro-paid hoopla about the inevitability of AI everywhere, there is a clear and growing movement against the insanity of turning humanity into AI’s dependent drones.  

The human agency that makes us capable of empathic understanding of our human experience, embedded as it is in world that shapes us and a world we shape, is at stake.  And more and more people are coming to realize that nipping the bot bud has to begin with children.  Thank you, Norway!!

From Reuters:

OSLO, June 19 (Reuters) - Norway is imposing a near ban on the use of generative AI tools by elementary school pupils while also restricting their ​use in the education of older children to prevent a ‌negative impact on learning, the country's prime minister said on Friday.

Facing a broad decline in education test scores, the government in 2024 banned smartphones from schools and has ​given teachers back more powers to enforce discipline in the ​classroom. . . .

Abby Zimet

If you haven’t been reading Abby Zimet’s cultural annotations at Common Dreams, you should. They would make me cry if they didn’t make me laugh. Sometimes they make me do both.

White Trash Losers ‘R Us

Oof, so many fails. An abject purge from the Kennedy Center, a tatty Iran deal, a brackish Reflecting Pool. And at the People's House, pay-per-view bloodsport rife with jingoism, fireworks, flyovers, honor guards for Nazi thugs, grift vast and brazen, the crass smear of an iconic woman in the name of "a permission structure made visible" emboldening "the worst people in the world." The result: "The cringiest collapse of a nation in real time."

Abby Zimet

Jun 17, 2026

Nashville Turns Out to Resist AI Data Centers

 

Happy Obama Appreciation Day

 Clip from 2011 White House Correspondents' Dinner:

The National Push for a Five-Year Pause on Generative AI in Schools

Join the growing movement to establish a five-year moratorium on the use of generative AI in schools.  

From Fairplay’s Position Statement:

As generative AI products1 proliferate in educational spaces, they are posing risk of significant harm to children. We, the undersigned, call for a five-year pause on all student-facing generative AI products in PreK-12 schools. Currently, these products threaten:

a) Student and educator privacy and autonomy; 

b) Skill development, including cognition, critical thinking, analytic  reasoning, decision-making, emotion regulation, and relationship-building; 

c) Mental health, fairness, safety, and the right to a high-quality education; 

d) Educators’ role as professionals; 

e) Academic integrity; 

f) The environment.

. . . .

CALL FOR FIVE-YEAR PAUSE

The rapid expansion of generative AI products into schools without oversight, community input, or evaluation of implications is not inevitable. A five-year pause on all products using generative AI that impact children in pre-K-12 schools would allow time for school communities, including students, educators, administrators, and parents, to learn about the implications and uses of generative AI products in education, to ask questions, and to provide feedback.

In particular, it would give time for schools to train staff and ensure that any generative AI products used will:

● Improve learning outcomes without cognitive offloading or impeding human relationships;

● Demonstrate absolute safety for use by students (addressing issues of addiction, persuasive design, data and privacy risks, exposure to harmful content, mental health, parasocial relationships, cyberbullying, etc);

● Not be used for non-authorized purposes such as cheating, academic

dishonesty, or plagiarism;

● Sufficiently consider and prioritize privacy, civil rights, ethics, justice, and climate impacts of generative AI products;

● Never be used in place of teachers, especially for vulnerable populations such as neurodivergent students, at-risk students, and students of low socio-economic status.

Until and unless the above can be shown (or there is evidence to support all of the above), generative AI products should not be used in pre-K-12 schools. Further, state and provincial governments and education departments, and federal, state, and provincial regulators should use this pause to develop and implement:

● An audit of existing generative AI platforms for efficacy, safety, and legality, performed by neutral, independent third parties;

● A registry of generative AI products currently in use, including the location of collected data, especially the intellectual property of students and teachers;

● A vetting process for new generative AI products prior to their introduction into pre-K-12 schools;

● A framework for culturally-responsive, relational approaches to communication that provides opportunities for technology-free, play-based learning spaces;

● Transparent, thoughtful, protective, and rigorous protections governing the use of generative AI products in schools, independently vetted by neutral third parties;

● Sufficient policies to protect student data, eliminate any advertising or marketing, prohibit addictive algorithms and gamification, and forbid products that maximize engagement or profit off student data.

Written by members of the Screen Time Action Network’s Screens in Schools Work Group: Emily Cherkin, MEd, Faith Boninger, PhD, Shaleen Title, MS, JD, Denise Champney, MS, CCC-SLP, and Kelly Clancy, PhD. No generative AI was used to produce this document.

Premieres October 9

 

AI Tutoring is the Logical Extension of High-Stakes Testing

Clips from an excellent op-ed in the NYTimes by the President of Bank Street College in New York.  After you read it, follow this link, and get onboard:

Last year, I visited a seventh-grade math classroom in a public school in the Bronx. Twenty students sat bent over laptops, working with an A.I. tutor on story problems about converting fractions to decimals. A teacher moved around the room, checking a dashboard that tracked how many tries each student needed to reach the right answer.

On the surface, the classroom was working. Students were engaged, and most of them, eventually, were getting to the right answers.

When I looked closely, though, many of the students were lost. They didn’t understand fractions conceptually. Each time one of them made a mistake, the A.I. tutor backed up and suggested another step, but it never identified the underlying gap in understanding. The teacher could not see it either. Her dashboard showed which students were stuck, but not why.

The core intellectual work of teaching is noticing why a child’s understanding breaks down and then knowing what to do. It might mean pausing the class for a mini-lesson or pulling out fraction tiles for one student who needs to visualize the math. In the class I visited, that work had been handed to a tool that could do neither. No one was arguing about strategy or turning to the kid across the table to ask, “Wait, how did you get that?” Each child sat alone. Silent, in front of a screen, clicking away.  

. . .For a generation, American schools have been shaped by standardized tests that measure a narrow band of skills. Because the tests carry high stakes, teachers teach to them. The curriculum narrows. Time for projects, argument and problem-solving shrinks. The A.I. tutor drilling concepts a seventh grader doesn’t understand is not an aberration of that system. It is its logical extension. 

. . . .Parents and educators across the country are organizing. In New York City, they have demanded a moratorium on A.I. in schools. Nationally, a coalition of more than 250 child development experts and advocacy organizations is calling for a five-year pause on generative A.I. in K-12 classrooms. They are right to be alarmed. . . .

Dear PGA: Please Help

 

@pganews.bsky.social I love to watch the PGA on TV, but because so many of your tournaments are on a fascist-controlled network (CBS) that I and millions of others do not watch, I am left on Sunday afternoons without golf’s soothing semi-whispered commentary that my proper napping requires.

— James Horn (@schools-matter24.bsky.social) June 8, 2026 at 9:06 AM

Victims’ Revenge?

With politicos, tech bros, cryptos, and other billionaire scummers having gone all-in on the AI insanity game, what recourse will there be for non-violent resistance and protest against the tech-infused planetary plunder and genocide?

Will yachts the size of ocean liners or magnificent island hideaways or fortressed mountain retreats insulate the elite rapacious perpetrators from the billions of victims intent upon accountability or, at least, revenge?  

Will there be forgiveness for the unforgivable?  

A clip from a good article this morning at the Guardian:

. . . . The closing off of legitimate avenues to address public opposition to AI, as well as the feeling that the technology is being forced upon society, is creating what researchers describe as a gap in accountability that can further incentivize terrorism and political violence.

Donald Trump, in alignment with tech leaders, issued an executive order last year attempting to block any state-level legislation that would rein in AI development and has said that nothing will slow down the US in the global AI race. Tech billionaires are also pouring millions of dollars into lobbying and political spending in an attempt to prevent regulation of AI.

“When authorities are too busy, or just don’t care enough, to regulate and take action, then people affected are going to take action,” said Mauro Lubrano, a lecturer at the University of Bath and author of Stop the Machines: The Rise of Anti-Technology Extremism. . . .

And then there are those like Molly Jong-Fast, who gave a commencement address last week at her alma mater, Bennington College.  She had this to say in a NYTimes op-ed just after. 

I hope her guarded optimism is warranted:

If I were to tell these graduates the truth about artificial intelligence, it would be this: You are right to be worried. But none of this is as inevitable as it seems. Remember putting everything on the blockchain? Remember NFTs? Hell, some of us are old enough to remember that the world was supposed to end in the year 2000.

Right now, A.I. is in its dark hype period — great for Anthropic’s I.P.O. — but who knows how useful any of this actually will be in the end in creating efficiencies (as in, replacing the young with bots). It’s within young people’s power to stop. Demand regulation of tech companies. Elect people who will legislate that regulation. Organize against data centers in your hometowns.

Don’t just boo — do something.

 

Tech Bros Racing to Take AI Crap Companies Public Before the Bubble Breaks

 

OpenAI and Anthropic now racing to go public before the AI bubble disintegrates. Stock sales to the dumb and the greedy will guarantee billionaire status for the top bros, who will use their inside knowledge to sell off before the collapse.

[image or embed]

— James Horn (@schools-matter24.bsky.social) June 2, 2026 at 2:25 PM

Texas, the School Police State

In Texas, as in other states where unrestricted access to guns has led to an epidemic of gun violence and fear of mass shootings, the result has been an increased presence of police and accompanying police brutality inside institutions of learning. 

The New York Times offers a grueling account of a detailed investigation into policing policy and practice inside Texas public schools. Shocking stuff, even for a state governed by a supermajority of christofascists.

Clips:

. . . the constant presence of officers has transformed the way many public schools manage discipline, subjecting students to heavy-handed police tactics for behavior that once would have landed them only in the principal’s office, The New York Times and The San Antonio Express-News found.

Officers in Texas displayed startling belligerence at times, grabbing or tackling students a fraction of their size over misconduct that often appeared to be minor. Children in elementary school, including one as young as 6, were handcuffed. Teenagers were arrested, charged with crimes and even jailed. In the most extreme cases, they wound up in hospitals, bruised or concussed, after being body-slammed or shocked by Tasers, which are prohibited in the state’s juvenile detention facilities but allowed in its public schools. . . .

. . . in Texas, no state agency has the power to routinely review school officers’ actions and weigh in on possible overreach.

Lawmakers here have embraced school policing without establishing safeguards required for meaningful accountability, policing experts said. A 2019 law meant to keep officers out of “routine student discipline” does not define the term or detail repercussions for violations. Police departments in Texas are not required to report incidents of force in schools unless they shoot someone.