"A child's learning is the function more of the characteristics of his classmates than those of the teacher." James Coleman, 1972
Showing posts with label school turnaround model. Show all posts
Showing posts with label school turnaround model. Show all posts

Wednesday, October 12, 2016

Trade you a backpack of badges for a caring teacher & well-resourced school.


from Wrench in the Gears
October 10, 2016

This is the third in a series intended to describe the process by which education reformers are transitioning us from neighborhood schools to learning eco-systems. For additional background you can read “From Neighborhood Schools to Learning Eco-Systems, A Dangerous Trade” and “Questions We Should Be Asking About Future Ready Schools.”

Since the passage of the Every Student Succeeds Act, the drumbeat for “innovative,” “personalized” education has grown stronger and more insistent. Key to the successful implementation of Education Reform 2.0 is convincing the public that education in school buildings with certified human teachers is obsolete. The No Child Left Behind Act laid the groundwork. It created increasingly hostile working conditions for teachers, inhumane learning conditions for students, and emphasized standards and test scores above all else.

While the public was sold a story that national standards were about ensuring equity for all children, parents of children enrolled in predominately low-income districts know that is not true. Time and time again we have seen that the standards-based accountability frameworks established under NCLB focus on outputs, NEVER inputs. These laws did not secure additional resources for children in need. They were designed to raise expectations for college and career readiness while kneecapping, through ongoing austerity budgets, our schools’ ability to meet our children’s most basic needs. Imposition of Common Core State Standards, value-added measures, high school exit exams, third-grade reading guarantees, test-score based “turnaround” policies, data-walls, and the like, have gradually institutionalized a punitive, data-driven approach to education across our country.

So what exactly does that have to do with badges? Well, data-driven education and badges go hand-in-hand. It makes sense once you realize the end goal is to replace our current system of public education with individualized pathways geared to “anytime, anyplace, any pace” learning mediated largely through technological devices that collect and aggregate educational data. The data is all aligned to The Common Educational Data Standards and now xAPI or Tin Can has replaced SCORM to make collection of online and offline educational data easily trackable.

This is not limited to K12 or even P20, the powers that be envision this process of meeting standards and collecting badges to be something we will have to do our ENTIRE LIVES. If you haven’t yet seen the “Learning is Earning” video-stop now and watch it, because it makes this very clear. Badges are representations of standards that have been met, competencies that have been proven. Collections of badges could determine our future career opportunities. The beauty of badges from a reformer’s perspective is that they are linked to pre-determined standards and can be earned “anywhere.” You can earn them from an online program, from a community partner, even on the job. As long as you can demonstrate you have mastery of a standard, you can claim the badge and move on to the next bit of micro-educational content needed to move you along your personalized pathway to the workforce.

In this brave, new world education will no longer be defined as an organic, interdisciplinary process where children and educators collaborate in real-time, face-to-face, as a community of learners. Instead, 21st century education is about unbundling and tagging discrete skill sets that will be accumulated NOT with the goal of becoming a thoughtful, curious member of society, but rather for attaining a productive economic niche with as little time “wasted” on “extraneous” knowledge as possible. The problem, of course, is that we know our children’s futures will depend on flexibility, a broad base of knowledge, the ability to work with others, and creative, interdisciplinary thinking, none of which are rewarded in this new “personalized pathway/badging” approach to education.

Click on this link to read the entire article in Wrench in the Gears.

Thursday, December 12, 2013

Mass Insight into Evansville: Gates, Broad, and Joyce in Indiana

By Doug Martin

The Evansville Vanderburgh School Corporation is fighting to keep its recently hired Boston-based Mass Insight Education turnaround company.  Mass Insight Education was hired last school year for $600,000 to help “turn around” Glenwood’s Leadership Academy and four other schools in the corporation which have received poor grades over the last few years. 

According to a recent State Impact Indiana story, Mass Insight Education isn't too happy about the state department of education looking too closely into its gig, calling another “lead partner” in the Evansville schools as “just more noise.” 
Mass Insight Education knows quite a bit about "noise," working hard to cover up that its corporate-sponsored school turnaround program has a dismal track record.  Using the Arne Duncan/Bill Gates/Eli Broad school privatization playbook, Mass Insight moves into states (often with the help of government officials), gets outlandish financial contracts at various schools, fires teachers and principals, and spreads its fake magic.

As Jim Horn has written here at Schools Matter, Mass Insight gets funding from the same corporations that helped Obama set up the Race to the Top rules.  Although over 80% of its funding comes from taxpayers (see line 14 in page 14 in PDF), Mass Insight is subsidized by Bill Gates (best known for promoting the Common Core takeover of education), billionaire Obama-campaign donor Eli Broad (who trains business leaders to "lead" public schools), Exxon Mobile, the Susan and Michael Dell Foundation, the charter school funding Barr Foundation, and the Nellie Mae Education Foundation, the latter which Hannah Bell notes was “originally involved in the student loan biz,” and “spun off that biz which was snapped up by for-profit Sallie Mae.”
Mass Insight Education has some out-of-state friends who pushed the school privatization agenda in Indiana, too.  Mass Insight received $100,000 in Joyce Foundation money in 2012.  If we remember, the Joyce Foundation (where Obama used to be a "community organizer") and the Mind Trust funded corporate hedge fund front group Stand for Children to move into Indiana and pass bills to throw teachers under the bus in 2011.

William Guenther, who owns Mass Insight Education, is a very happy boy.  In fact, in 2012, he raked in over $400,000. 
In Connecticut, Mass Insight worked with Gov. Malloy, a Democrat, for a school privatization coup.  In fact, Mass Insight’s Justin Cohen, the former Edison Schools employee and senior advisor to Michelle Rhee when she destroyed DC public schools as chancellor, praised the school turnaround agenda in his testimony for Senate Bill 24 in Connecticut in 2012 and spoke at one of the governor’s education summits at Connecticut State University.  Malloy’s government then turned around this year and handed Mass Insight—which also does lobbying—almost $124,000 with even more money to flow to the group, as Jonathan Pelto details.     

Well-respected education blogger Gary Rubinstein said this about Mass Insight’s horrible track record of doing anything with its turnaround schools except take public money: “On their School Turnaround Group [website] they list eight successful ‘turnarounds’ from around the country. Ironically, these eight ‘turnarounds’ were led by companies other than Mass Insight, but as Mass Insight doesn’t seem to want to put its own record up to scrutiny, they use these case studies to show the sorts of strategies that Mass Insight employs in its own turnarounds.”
Rubinstein has also found that Mass Insight pulled in $75 million from six different states in 2010. 

The Evansville, Indiana, community is meeting next week to discuss what to do about its so-called “failing” schools.  Parents, teachers, and school leaders should be aware that the turnaround school model is a scam to get taxpayer money.  They should also be aware that the State Board of Education in Indiana has a say-so in whether or not to intervene into the Evansville situation and/or to allow the Gates, Joyce, Broad buddies at Mass Insight Education to continue its “turnaround” scheme.  Since most state board members are pro-school privatization, we know what side they will be on.
Many teachers have jumped ship, and I wish the ones still in Evansville well.  And my suggestion is simple: Evansville needs to get rid of Mass Insight Education and send it shipping back to its billionaire supporters.