Chavous, Personalized Learning, and Real Indy Voices

.


By Doug Martin

“The end game … is personalized learning.  We are going to get to this place where as opposed to every child being shepherded into a schoolhouse where they sit in a classroom and where a teacher stands and delivers, and then they regurgitate back … those days are not going to be the future.”  KEVIN CHAVOUS

When Kevin Chavous joined the Indianapolis-based Mind Trust board of directors in late 2015, it was a sign of more bad things to come.  Chavous, as I discuss in Hoosier School Heist, has been a paid spokesperson for corporate ed reform from day one, working for the Democrats for Education Reform, the DeVos/Walton clan, the Black Alliance for Educational Options, and even the digital/virtual/personalized learning movement invading the United States. 

Since charter schools and online learning companies have used blended and virtual learning for years, the billionaires’ plan now, to kick "the end game" in gear, is to dupe local public school districts and teachers to buy into the edtech arrangement, seeking to dismantle public education from inside the schoolhouse itself.

It is working, and Chavous’ voice is a part of it. 

Chavous’ edtech/virtual learning promotion goes back at least to 2010, when he sat on Jeb Bush and Bob Wise’s Digital Learning Council,” an ALEC promoted outfit, alongside representatives from Google, Apple, Connections Academy, Carnegie Corporation, K12, INC., the Gates Foundation, Rocketship, Microsoft, the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation, and many others.

The Digital Learning Council also included Michael Horn from the Innosight Institute, now a separate consulting group and connected to the Christensen Institute for Disruptive Innovation, a leader in the personalized learning movement.  Horn will be in Indianapolis at MSD of Warren Township Schools next month as a keynote speaker (along with Tom Sayer, Head of School Transformation and Change for Google for Education).  I have much more on Horn (and privacy issues surrounding Google for Education) to say at a later date. 

In January 2016, Chavous began chairing a new "charity" started by virtual learning company K12, INC. entitled Foundation for Blended and Online Learning, which promises to give out scholarships and grants to students and teachers, or in Chavous’ words, "to advance the field of blended and digital learning with an emphasis on giving back to schools, students and communities."

When the Lindsay Unified School District (LUSD) in California, with a beginning $499,860 grant from the Gates Foundation for the California Consortium for Development and Dissemination of Personalized Learning, took its big step in letting the corporate school/edtech promoters inside of its schools in 2016, adding later in June of that year a partnership with Facebook’s Chan Zuckerberg Initiative and another $2.5 million grant from Gates (for LUSD’s connections to the edtech movement and more on the Gates grant, read this by Alison McDowell), Chavous was included in a book entitled Beyond Reform: Systemic Shifts Toward Personalized Learning by the Lindsay Unified School District, published in February of this year by Marzano Research in Bloomington, Indiana, which was devoted to praising LUSD’s digital upgrade. 

 In the book, Chavous writes: "The Lindsay Unified School District story represents one of the most amazing success stories in American public education history ... I have visited hundreds of school districts around the country, and none has been able to do what Lindsay has done."

In October 2016, Chavous, in an editorial in The Detroit News, called on Detroit schools (in shambles, crumbing, and many rat-infested at the time of Chavous' article) to change to a personalized learning system,  where he tried to sell Detroit the Indianapolis Innovation Network Model and the Mind Trust, writing that “The new leaders for the reconstituted schools are trained through a fellowship program administered by the Mind Trust, a highly regarded education nonprofit group. Indy parents and students love the new and improved schools.”

But parents and students and the community in Indy rightfully  don't trust the corporate narrative that Chavous and others are selling.   That is why tonight, June 5th at 6 PM, concerning the three high schools set to close in Indianapolis,  an open community meeting (not sponsored by the Indianapolis Public Schools or the Mind Trust, but sponsored by Concerned Clergy, Parent Power, Community Voice for Education, Alliance to Reclaim Our Schools, Baptist Ministerial Alliance, and Education-Community Action Team) will take place at the Purpose of Life Ministries at 3705 W Kessler Blvd North Drive, at the corner of 38th and Kessler. 

It will be good to hear real voices for a change.   

Ferebee, Edtech Billionaires, and Indianapolis

(by Doug Martin)

As IPS seeks to close three high schools and Indianapolis opens more charter/blended learning schools, Indianapolis parents, teachers, and community members should know a few things about IPS supt. Lewis Ferebee and the edtech players promoting the so-called personalized learning/computer-based movement in Indianapolis. 

IS LEWIS FEREBEE THE NEW TONY BENNETT?

Following in the footsteps of past Indiana and Florida state school supt. Tony Bennett, Lewis Ferebee, in May 2016, became a member of Jeb Bush’s Foundation for Excellent Education’s offspring, Chiefs for Change, the virtual, blended, and personalized learning promoting group where Tony Bennett, as a member, became known nationally before crashing after the Indiana grade-changing scandal.   

Like Bennett who championed school reform ideas his doctoral dissertation proved wrong (as I note in my book Hoosier School Heist), Ferebee  supports school choice, although for his dissertation, as Scott Elliott points out, “Ferebee had studied the effect of the promotion of school choice as a school improvement strategy in the federal No Child Left Behind law and concluded it had little impact on student learning.”  As a believer, Ferebee recently helped IPS land $100,000 from the Gates Foundation (a key personalized learning promoter) to partner with charter schools. 

With Chiefs for Change lately having an uptick of new members alongside Ferebee, the group last month received a personalized learning grant (amount undisclosed) from  limited liability company the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, led by Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg and his wife, for a “Transforming Schools and Systems Workgroup” to spread the “anytime, anyplace learning” of personalized learning across the United States, a plan which, by the way, the Mind Trust’s Education Cities has been selling the last few years through its Harbormaster Network.  

Zuckerberg, besides running Facebook, is best known for his $100 million “gift” to the Newark, New Jersey state-controlled schools to help expand charter schools as public schools collapsed and were closed down by supt. Cami Anderson.

THE NEWSCHOOLS VENTURE FUND

In May 2017, Ferebee joined a panel discussion on “ESSA opportunity” at the NewSchools Venture Fund Summit (sponsored by the Walton and Gates foundations and the Zuckerberg Initiative), where personalized learning was the buzzword since NewSchools, last year, released “an aggressive call” for corporate ed reformers “to direct $4 billion in philanthropy toward creating, studying, and promoting” innovative schools and personalized learning.  

NewSchools Venture Fund is a Silicon Valley nonprofit/for-profit investor in edtech startups and personalized learning and has its thumbprints all over Indianapolis, investing $200,000 in Phalen Leadership Academy and $105,000 in Mitch Daniels’s Purdue Polytech High School.  

Among the NewSchools Venture Fund board and its donors are several wealthy edtech leaders who also funded the IPS school board race in 2014 and Democrats in Indiana recently: 

• Lauren Powell Jobs, Steve Jobs' widow, who gave Mary Ann Sullivan $5,000 in 2012 and John Gregg and the Democrats’ ActBlue $5,000 each in 2016.
• Tony Bennett funder, edtech investor, and Oxycontin producer Jonathan Sackler, who handed Mary Ann Sullivan $2,500 for her IPS race.  Jonathan Sackler is a heavy investor in the blended learning edtech company Education Elements, which partnered with MSD Warren Township schools in Indy after it won  a $28.5 million Race to the Top grant.  
• Facebook COO Sheryl Sandberg, a NewSchools donor, who gave Mary Ann Sullivan $2,000 while she was a candidate for state office (see here,  here, and here).  Sandberg's late husband, Dave Goldberg, was a NewSchools Venture Fund board member. 
• Billionaire edtech investor and LinkedIn’s CEO Reid Hoffman and his wife Michelle Yee each gave $1,000 to Kelly Bentley (page 6), $1,000 (page 4) a piece to LaNier Echols, and $1,000 each to Mary Ann Sullivan’s IPS board campaigns (page 2). Hoffman, who has also funded Democrat Tim Delaney’s campaign, is a NewSchools Venture Fund backer.

   

The NewSchools Venture Fund has popularized the phrase “Innovative Schools,” which is very similar to IPS’s “Innovation Schools” term.  The Mind Trust’s David Harris was part of the NewSchools Venture Funds Entrepreneurial Leaders for Public Education Program in 2007, and former Indianapolis mayor, Bart Petersen, along with Michelle Rhee, is a past recipient of the NewSchools Change Agent of the Year Award. 

Rooted School, one of the new Mind Trust “seed investment” schools set to open in Indianapolis, has been praised by the NewSchools Venture Fund. 

Donors to the NewSchools Venture Fund include a who’s who of edtech/corporate reformers, including the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, the Walton Family, the Michael and Susan Dell Foundation (which gave $588,000 to support Enroll Indy and “school equity efforts”), and the Gates Foundation. 

 

Personalized learning is one step beyond blended learning and seeks to get rid of as many teachers as possible and even eventually school buildings themselves.  Indianapolis born Kevin Chavous, a main player in Hoosier School Heist and a board member of the DeVos and Walton American Federation for Children, recently said:  “The end game … is personalized learning.  We are going to get to this place where as opposed to every child being shepherded into a schoolhouse where they sit in a classroom and where a teacher stands and delivers, and then they regurgitate back … those days are not going to be the future.”