The Reality of No Child Left Behind
The No Child Left Behind Act that President Bush signed into law in 2002 was intended to reform America’s educational system and promised to be the answer for the nation’s educational gap. I believed it was a winning formula: The ideas and thoughts conveyed in the law had the potential to be the perfect program for America’s schools, and students.The law promised to ensure the same education for children from low-income families attending public schools that children in private and parochial schools receive. NCLB is filled with rhetoric stressing the importance of having highly qualified teachers, encouraging and nurturing literacy in children, allowing parents to have choice in which school their child goes to, and holding schools accountable for the educational outcome of its students. The law promised adequate funding to achieve these goals.
By working on educational decisions together, the nation and its future would benefit as a whole.
"A child's learning is the function more of the characteristics of his classmates than those of the teacher." James Coleman, 1972
Monday, August 29, 2005
From the Mouths of Babes
Reprinted in its entirety, award-winning essay by Keisha Mitchell, age 16:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
From what I've seen, states have often unqualified or over worked staff members who are directing NCLB legislation. I've seen communication gaps especially between larger schools districts that often act autonomous from thier state department of education. Also, in some states turnover rate is a big deal. Some indiviuals use these positions as stepping stones into higher administrative positions and pass the buck so often that their currency is no longer in circulation. Its an absolute necessity in the American education system, but I do agree that states must reorganize their infrastructure. This is by no means universal since other state education agencies are well organized, but these have been in smaller, less populous states. I think its extrodinatory that a 16 year old wrote this essay/critique!
ReplyDelete