UPDATE: Charter School USA, in fact, was one of the sponsors of the school privatization rally at the statehouse today. See pic at the end of this article:
Thursday, February 19, 2015
Charter Schools USA, H4QED, and the Indiana State Board of Ed
UPDATE: Charter School USA, in fact, was one of the sponsors of the school privatization rally at the statehouse today. See pic at the end of this article:
Saturday, January 10, 2009
Why Doesn't This Feel Liberating?
Now, under this system, if your public school is failing, you'll have the option of transferring to another public school or charter school. And it's -- I view that as liberation. I view that as empowerment.Yes, yes, yes. Schools, indeed, have been liberated--from art, music, P.E., social studies, and even science. Throw in, or throw out, rather, Black History, health, holiday lore, assemblies, field trips, and recess and you have some real liberation, yes? Children have been empowered to cram their brains with testing items and to learn like parrots, all punctuated by their marching silently in the hallways to lunch 30 inches apart in lockstep.
Schools, yes, have been liberated from teachers who care too much or are too ethical to be part of the bureaucracies of sanctioned child abuse that schools have become in poor communities. Many of the teachers remaining have become empowered to create harsh behavior control regimens and to treat children as if it is their fault that they are not passing tests that would, otherwise, provide a teacher testing bonus. Urban schools have been liberated of most of their caring teachers.
Schools, too, have been liberated out of existence, to be replaced by charter chain gangs or church school vouchers that are no better or even worse than the impoverished public schools that are being shuttered. Charter school principals and mayors have been empowered to hire and fire at will without regard for due process or collective bargaining, while these same administrators have been liberated from any oversight or dissent from democratically-elected board members.
And children, yes, they have been liberated, too, from caring about what they are forced to "learn," liberated from any historical or cultural contexts for the factoids they parrot back at teachers. They have become empowered to pursue an anti-cultural sameness and a crass economic fundamentalism that makes education irrelevant unless it is motivated by a financial or other extrinsic reward.
Finally, the public has been liberated from a concern for what is imporant, what is significant educationally to sustain our republic, to maintain our political and cultural values, to preserve our ethics, to restore our environment, to even survive in the world as one of the best reasons to hope for the future of humankind.
As Cal State professor, Art Costa, has said, "What was once educationally significant, but difficult to measure, has been replaced by what is insignificant and easy to measure. So now we test how well we have taught what we do not value."
And yet he will not leave yet. He remains this week still the clueless and dangerous simpleton made senseless to the world by an unconscious convoluted stream of ideological bromides that are simply stunning in their absurdity and outlandishness:
The key to measuring is to test. And by the way, I've heard every excuse in the book why we should not test -- oh, there's too many tests; you teach the test; testing is intrusive; testing is not the role of government. How can you possibly determine whether a child can read at grade level if you don't test? And for those who claim we're teaching the test, uh-uh. We're teaching a child to read so he or she can pass the test.To sum up Bush and to mangle T. S. Eliot all at the same time,
Testing is important to solve problems. You can't solve them unless you diagnose the problem in the first place. . . .
. . . And the end of all his exploring
Will be to arrive where he started
And still not know the place for the first time.
Thursday, September 27, 2007
Decider Speaks: "Childrens Do Learn"
From Reuters:NEW YORK (Reuters) - Offering a grammar lesson guaranteed to make any English teacher cringe, President George W. Bush told a group of New York school kids on Wednesday: "Childrens do learn."
Bush made his latest grammatical slip-up at a made-for-TV event where he urged Congress to reauthorize the No Child Left Behind Act, the centerpiece of his education policy, as he touted a new national report card on improved test scores.
The event drew New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg, Education Secretary Margaret Spellings plus teachers and about 20 fourth and fifth graders from P.S. 76.
During his first presidential campaign, Bush -- who promised to be the "education president" -- once asked: "Is our children learning?"
On Wednesday, Bush seemed to answer his own question with the same kind of grammatical twist.
"As yesterday's positive report card shows, childrens do learn when standards are high and results are measured," he said.
The White House opted to clean up Bush's diction in the official transcript.
Bush is no stranger to verbal gaffes. He often acknowledges he was no more than an average student in school and jokes about his habit of mangling the English language.
Just a day earlier, the White House inadvertently showed how it tries to prevent Bush from making even more slips of the tongue than he already does.
As Bush addressed the U.N. General Assembly on Tuesday, a marked-up draft of his speech briefly popped up on the U.N. Web site, complete with a phonetic pronunciation guide to get him past troublesome names of countries and world leaders.
Wednesday, August 10, 2005
A little humor, yes
So Bush recently reiterated that he believes intelligence design should be taught in public schools. He says evolution is just a theory and intelligence design is just a theory. So why not teach both theories? Well, I have a theory. I believe that Bush believes in intelligence design because he knows that the only way he could have become president was...through divine intervention.
