"A child's learning is the function more of the characteristics of his classmates than those of the teacher." James Coleman, 1972

Thursday, May 22, 2014

Responding to Meghan Daum's reactionary attack on the Class of 2014 social justice movements

‎"Washing one's hands of the conflict between the powerful and the powerless means to side with the powerful, not to be neutral. " — Paulo Freire

LA Times columnist Meghan Daum takes issue with the Class of 2014's nationwide activism to resist and reject neoliberal reactionaries like Christine Lagarde and Condoleezza Rice as their commencement speakers. Her offensive College grads: With speakers as in life, at times you take what you can get accuses student activists of hubris, intolerance, anti-intellectualism, and extreme political correctness. As a proud member of the Class of 2014, and five years Daum's senior, I take issue with both her condescending tone, and her abysmal politics of passivity. Complying with her paper's 150 word limit for letters to the editor, I crafted the following response.

From: "Robert D. Skeels" <****@ucla.edu>
Date: May 22, 2014 12:15:46 PDT
To: mdaum@latimescolumnists.com
Cc: opinion@media.ucla.edu, letters@latimes.com
Subject: re: College grads: With speakers as in life, at times you take what you can get

Submitted online as a Letter to the Editor 05/22/2014 Regarding: "College grads: With speakers as in life, at times you take what you can get" <http://touch.latimes.com/#section/527/article/p2p-80271838/>

As a member of the UCLA class of 2014, I take exception to Meghan Daum's reactionary Op-Ed regarding commencement speakers. Older and more experienced than Daum, I find her tone of "you could do a whole lot worse" and "take what you can get" paternalistic. From an inappropriate use of scare quotes around adjectives that correctly describe the IMF, to providing political cover for mass murderers like the former Secretary of State, Daum's "be a gracious host" to your oppressors thesis is wrongheaded at best. Let's embrace students who are no longer willing to accept perpetrators of oppression and injustice as speakers. Daum wants us to "sit" and "listen". I say speak truth to power, and continue resisting what the celebrated Professor bell hooks calls "white supremacist capitalist patriarchy". Daum should consider that rather than settling for "you can do worse," true agency starts with "we can do better."

Robert D. Skeels ****@ucla.edu

"Problem posing education does not and cannot serve the interests of the oppressor" — Paulo Freire

Updated May 25, 2014: Perhaps Ms. Daum will reconsider her reactionary defense of the rejected IMF speaker in the light of this breaking news: Head of the IMF Christine Lagarde in court charged with embezzlement and fraud. Looks like Smith College students had the correct instincts right along. What did Daum call those students again? "Nincompoops", wasn't it?

Updated May 27, 2014: Uncharacteristically, the Times actually printed a heavily edited version of my letter to the editor.


  1. Colt Connor3:27 PM

    Misogynist piece of crap Robert D Skeels takes offense to three WOMEN, Condi Rice, Meghan Daum and Christine Lagarde.

  2. Megan Daum's primary talent is the ability to trivialize any topic, no matter how important.

    Seems she sides with the Powerful as well.
    I'm sure they appreciate her gift for triviality.