How Meta Got Everything It Wanted in a Secret Louisiana Data Center Deal www.nytimes.com/2026/07/27/t...
— James Horn (@schools-matter24.bsky.social) July 27, 2026 at 7:29 AM
[image or embed]
How Meta Got Everything It Wanted in a Secret Louisiana Data Center Deal www.nytimes.com/2026/07/27/t...
— James Horn (@schools-matter24.bsky.social) July 27, 2026 at 7:29 AM
[image or embed]
At the behest of Gov. Bobby Jindal, U.S. Secretary of Education Arne Duncan has been talking up White's credentials in calls to potential swing votes on the state board of education, which must elect a new state superintendent with at least eight of 11 votes. White is Jindal's pick to replace Paul Pastorek, who officially left the job last week with about seven months left in his term, At Jindal's suggestion, White would see out those remaining months while also serving in his current role as head of the Recovery School District, which oversees a majority of schools here.The fact that Jindal's pick is also Duncan's pick offers us assurance that The Pick has been vetted by the U. S. Chamber of Horrors' Business Roundtable, where both parties sit down together to feed on that endless supply of campaign cash.
Duncan has contacted at least two members of the state Board of Elementary and Secondary Education: Louella Givens, who represents New Orleans, and Linda Johnson of Plaquemine. . . .
The Charterites have a sweet plan emerging in Louisiana to reward corporate charter schools with Duncan's RTTT bribes that were ostensibly intended to help public schools. Rather than focusing on arm-twisting school systems to charter conversions or restructuring, State Superintendent Paul Pastorek plans to simply bribe starving school systems into ripping up their collective bargaining agreements to allow pay per score evaluation and pay plans. Those systems unwilling to go along simply get no money, while charters, with no collective bargaining agreements to begin with, can suck up all the dough that public schools should be getting. From the Times-Picauyne:
. . . .State Superintendent Paul Pastorek told state lawmakers this week that the shift to focus more heavily on "building great (school) leaders and teachers" stems from revised information released by the U.S. Department of Education, which will dole out the unprecedented competitive grant money.
Pastorek said participating districts must have or agree to build a strong teacher and administrator evaluation process that will be used in deciding pay, promotion, professional development and retention.
"If you are going to evaluate people, use it, " he said.
Not every district will necessarily have to conduct evaluations in the same way, state department of education officials said. But at least half of a teacher's evaluation should be based on student performance. Pastorek said that rewarding teachers based on how much progress they make with individual students might encourage strong teachers to go to high-needs schools where they can make greater gains.
While Pastorek said he thought the shift away from overhauling low-performing schools would make the proposal more palatable to some, the mandate to link teacher pay to student performance might discourage districts for a whole different set of reasons.
To join the state's application, school districts need the superintendent, school board and union president -- where applicable -- to sign on. Education officials noted that linking hiring and pay decisions to student test scores might require changes to collective bargaining agreements between districts and their teachers unions.
Some charter schools that constitute their own districts are also eligible to apply. Since charters control their own employee pay and hiring decisions, opposition from teachers unions or pre-existing collective bargaining agreements are less likely to be an issue for them.
A considerable amount of money could be at stake. The state plans to apply for $300 million, which would be split between statewide initiatives and block grants to participating districts. Earlier estimates from the department of education put potential funding for Louisiana, widely considered a strong contender for a share of the money, at $250 million.. . .
A change in Louisiana law last year is forcing local school systems to pay for many new charter schools whether they like them or not.
School superintendents are starting to fight back. Last month, superintendents flooded the state with letters of complaint directed at three proposals to create strictly online charter schools that in two cases would draw students from all over Louisiana.
The superintendents submitted a range of complaints, including the involvement of for-profit companies in these would-be cybercharters, and whether these schools can comply with a raft of state laws.
The complaints prompted the state Board of Elementary and Secondary Education to postpone consideration of these cybercharters and several other charter school proposals until December.
A key underlying complaint of the superintendents is concern about how the state will determine who pays for these new schools.
The law change is also at issue in a Union Parish lawsuit scheduled to reach a Baton Rouge courtroom Thursday.
Until June 2008, the state solely paid the cost for these charter schools, known as Type 2 charters. Charter schools are exempt from many of the normal requirements imposed on public schools in hopes that they will serve as educational laboratories.
The charter schools relied mostly on the normal state-allocated per-pupil funding that pays for public schools. The state, however, also covered the sizable chunk of money that local sales taxes and property taxes normally covered through a separate annual appropriation.
The Legislature, however, changed that. An amendment on the Senate floor to an unrelated bill late in the 2008 regular session mandated that Type 2 charters created thenceforth would get not only state per-pupil funding, but would also receive a share of local sales taxes and property taxes. . . . .
Jones, president of the Louisiana Association of School Superintendents, is blunt about what he thinks of that new law.
“It’s kind of like the Boston Tea Party all over again,” said Jones, superintendent of schools in Rapides Parish. “It’s taxation without representation.”
In this case, local voters approved sales taxes and property taxes for public education in their cities and parishes and made the local school boards the stewards of these funds.
Jones views the redirection of such money to charter schools already rejected by local school boards as an unlawful taking of public funds.
Jones said online charter schools present even more of a problem because they could siphon away local sales and property taxes from every one of the state’s 70 school districts.
Jones said superintendents, along with other public education groups, hope to persuade the Legislature to reverse course when it reconvenes next spring.
Failing that, Jones said, he expects lawsuits will arise, though he said he has no plans at present to head to court.
Keith Guice, president of the state Board of Elementary and Secondary Education, said the superintendents have a point.
“I think there is a potential for litigation involving the local taxes going to schools where the tax was approved not for that purpose,” the BESE president said.
Guice, who is from Monroe, is no stranger to this controversy. Just northwest of him in Farmerville, the Union Parish school system is already in court over a new charter school.
The school system is suing the state Department of Education to try to regain more than $500,000 that it estimates is being redirected this school year to the new D’Arbonne Woods Charter School in Farmerville. A hearing is scheduled for 10 a.m. Thursday before state District Judge Todd Hernandez. . . .
BATON ROUGE -- Gov. Bobby Jindal will launch the second special legislative session of his 8-week-old administration today aimed at spending a $1.1 billion surplus left over from last year's budget and pursuing a widely popular effort to eliminate three taxes on business.The rest here.
But during the narrow window of time for the session, Jindal is also proposing a surprise initiative that signals a significant shift in state policy by offering government support for private school tuition expenses.
Following a path that only a few other states have taken, Jindal and his top allies in the Legislature want to give parents a state income tax deduction for 50 percent of their private school tuition up to $5,000, which generally would result in tax savings of $60 to $300 per pupil. It also would give a tax break for home schooling expenses.
Although the program's overall $20 million price tag is relatively minor compared to the billions of dollars in the state budget, the program crosses a line that Louisiana has long placed between public and private school support and would create a tax break tilted in favor of those with higher incomes.
"I'm pretty confident it's something that we have widespread support for," said Rep. Hunter Greene, R-Baton Rouge, chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee that will consider the proposal.
Greene has reason to be confident. A similar initiative passed overwhelmingly last spring but was vetoed by Gov. Kathleen Blanco, who said she feared "that this legislation may subsidize private schools at the expense of public school children."
With Jindal as governor, a veto is practically out of the picture. But that fact may change the calculations for some lawmakers, and the House and Senate this year are composed of many new members.
"I think it's going to be one of those issues that's pretty hotly debated," said Rep. Don Trahan, R-Lafayette, chairman of the House Education Committee. . . .