Congressional Democrats: WATCH AND LISTEN!

 

I’m telling you @hakeem-jeffries.bsky.social, please watch this. This is the energy. Not egg prices and book tours and strongly worded letters. It’s time to take the gloves off.

[image or embed]

— Mueller, She Wrote (@muellershewrote.bsky.social) February 21, 2025 at 9:21 AM

Neoliberal Corporate Education Reform… for “other” peoples’ kids

“CCSS assume an American population embodied with a similar history of freedom and cultural ‘neutrality’ or ‘universality’” — Donald H. Smith, Ph.D.

The Atlantic has a surprisingly candid piece entitled “A Public-School Paradox” about the hypocrisy of the establishment elite in Washington not sending their own offspring to public schools. This has been exacerbated by the fact that the most vociferous neoliberal corporate education reform proponents — like Barack Obama, Arne Duncan, and Hillary Rodham Clinton — are all private school parents. Disconnected and disinvested from the public commons, they advocate for horrific, racist, classist “reforms” that only serve to widen the gap between working class families and themselves. Especially disturbing is this trio of Democratic politicians’ full-throated support of the white supremacist Common Core State Standards (CCSS), a curriculum from which their own scion were spared. This is equally true, if not more so, for reactionary, right-wing troglodytes like Donald J. Trump, whose, as The Atlantic piece points out: “five children all attend(ed) private schools”. It’s almost a given that George W. Bush, whose contempt of public schools was apparent in his support of segregationist charter schools and imposing NCLB on a hapless nation, would have sent his scion to private schools while president, had they been that age.

My brief comments in reaction to the piece follow.

---

Sidwell Friends School is the polar opposite of the horrific KIPP dungeons Obama advocates for other POC kids. My editor at Schools Matter — Dr. Jim Horn — has been publishing chapters from his book on KIPP, but I have a paper copy I’ll read once the MPRE is over. It was Horn that coined the phrase “cultural sterilization” to describe the no excuses model inflicted on students. I can’t think of a better way to frame it, nor anything more removed from the experience of establishment elitists that advocate it for “other” peoples’ children.

Meritocracy myths allow neoliberal Democrats to proffer education as an inequality palliative

“They favored policies that created “equal opportunity” and fostered “individual rights,” instead of those designed to eradicate the structural underpinnings of racial segregation and economic inequity.”—Professor Lily Geismer, "Atari Democrats", Jacobin

Thomas Frank has a new book out. While I've only read excerpts from his previous works, and several of his essays, I think Paul D'Amato sums up Frank well in that he: "offers some important food for thought–but it’s more of a snack than a full meal." That said, given the precariousness of public education in this era of neoliberalism, even a snack may stave off starvation. Frank is making the tour discussing his new work, and a friend posted one of the interviews. I was listening to it in the background while studying for my Civil Procedure midterm (the arcana of Judgment Non Obstante Veredicto, and other FRCP 50 mysteries), when I heard Frank say something that most of us touch upon when discussing the plutocrats pushing neoliberal corporate education reform. That is regarding the meritocracy myth.

The audio being discussed is at the 21:07 mark and my rough transcription follows.

Democrats are like no, no, no... that's not right. You've got to give everyone student loans. You got to build charter schools. Both sides have their pat answers that have nothing to do with the problem...

This is a book about Democrats, and they see every economic problem as an educational problem, requiring more student loans, more charter schools. That sort of thing. People studying STEM subjects, or whatever it is. This is just how they interpret the world. Why do they do they interpret the world that way? Because that's what worked for them personally. If you look at the biographies of different, prominent Democrats of our time, they all have this eerily similar biography. They are often plucked from obscurity by prestigious universities. Look at Bill Clinton, this kid in Hot Springs Arkansas, goes to Georgetown University, then he's a Rhodes Scholar, then he goes to Yale Law School. All his friends have this similar kind of background. Look at Barack Obama. He goes to Columbia, then Harvard Law School, and is the editor of the Harvard Law Review. For these guys academic achievement and prestige, that's what opened the doors for them, and it is very natural for them to assume that is what will open the doors for everyone else. Now I'm a great believer in education, I spent twenty-five years of my life getting one. But I'm here to tell you that that's not the solution for inequality. We need education, obviously everyone needs to know how to read and do math. We need experts.

That is not the problem with the economy. The problem is not that workers are not smart enough. The problem is that workers don't have any power.

That last, overarching issue is the crux of the problem. I'd like to delve into it further, but that will have to wait until summer break. The other issue of the Democrats championing the meritocracy myth and their pandering the false notion that education will solve inequality is of crucial importance during this election cycle. The Geismer piece cited in the beginning of this post discusses a Democratic Party candidate's ties to many of the worst of the cult of meritocracy.

In her 2016 campaign bid, Hillary Clinton has strengthened these ties, surpassing candidates from both parties in individual donations from employees at the ten highest-grossing companies in Silicon Valley, including Google, Facebook, Apple, and eBay.

Four more years of neoliberalism and wrongheaded education policy are a frightening prospect. Now is time for action.

Why Have Some Civil Rights Groups Flipped on Standardized Testing?

By Ken Derstine @ Defend Public Education!
August 10, 2015
(Most recent link update August 13, 2015)

 

In 1947, as a student at Morehouse College, an eighteen-year old Martin Luther King, Jr. wrote an article for the student newspaper The Maroon Tiger. In the article, The Purpose of Education, he explained his vision of what education should be. He said education should not be about equipping students “with the proper instruments of exploitation so that they can forever trample over the masses”. He continued, education must also be about more than training for a career, stating,

“Education must also train one for quick, resolute and effective thinking. To think incisively and to think for one's self is very difficult. We are prone to let our mental life become invaded by legions of half truths, prejudices, and propaganda. At this point, I often wonder whether or not education is fulfilling its purpose. A great majority of the so-called educated people do not think logically and scientifically. Even the press, the classroom, the platform, and the pulpit in many instances do not give us objective and unbiased truths. To save man from the morass of propaganda, in my opinion, is one of the chief aims of education. Education must enable one to sift and weigh evidence, to discern the true from the false, the real from the unreal, and the facts from the fiction.” 

_______________

On October 28, 2014, eleven civil rights groups sent a letter to President Obama and Education Secretary Arne Duncan urging them to drop the test based K-12 ‘accountability’ system. In it they state,

“While the need for accountability is almost universally agreed upon, there have been concerns raised about overly punitive accountability systems that do not take into account the resources, geography, student population, and needs of specific schools. In particular, the No Child Left Behind law has not accomplished its intended goals of substantially expanding educational equity or significantly improving educational outcomes. Racial achievement and opportunity gaps remain large, and many struggling school systems have made little progress under rules that emphasize testing without investing. We must shift towards accountability strategies that promote equity and strengthen, rather than weaken, schools in our communities, so that they can better serve students and accelerate student success.”

The letter goes on to list eight recommendations – none of which call for high stakes testing.

The organizations signing the letter were:

Advancement Project

Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights Under Law

League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC)

Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund (MALDEF)

National Association for the Advancement of Colored People

National Opportunity to Learn (OTL) Campaign

National Urban League (NUL)

NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund (LDF)

National Council on Educating Black Children (NCEBC)

National Indian Education Association (NIEA)

Southeast Asia Resource Action Center (SEARAC)

On May 5, 2015, twelve civil rights organizations, including some of those listed above issued a press release opposing opting-out of standardized tests. In it they state,

“Standardized tests, as ‘high stakes tests,’ have been misused over time to deny opportunity and undermine the educational purpose of schools, actions we have never supported and will never condone.  But the anti-testing efforts that appear to be growing in states across the nation, like in Colorado and New York, would sabotage important data and rob us of the right to know how our students are faring. When parents ‘opt out’ of tests—even when out of protest for legitimate concerns—they’re not only making a choice for their own child, they’re inadvertently making a choice to undermine efforts to improve schools for every child.”

The organizations signing the press release were:

*The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights (also known as NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund)

The American Association of University Women (AAUW)

Association of University Centers on Disabilities (AUCD)

Council of Parent Attorneys and Advocates, Inc. (COPAA)

Disability Rights Education and Defense Fund (DREDF)

*League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC)

*NAACP

*National Council of La Raza (NCLR)

National Disability Rights Network (NDRN)

*National Urban League (NUL)

*Southeast Asia Resource Action Center (SEARAC)

TASH

The organizations that signed both documents are marked with an asterisk.

That standardized tests are needed for funding decisions is a bogus claim. Community income levels should determine the needs of a school. Torturing students for hours with tests that have nothing to do with diagnosis or remediation of student learning deficits are not going to bring equity in education. Quite the opposite!

Under corporate education reform, which is a full-scale assault on public education, standardized tests are used to rank teachers and schools for the purpose of closing schools or doing a “turnaround” from a public to a charter school. The ultimate purpose of these tests is to advance a privatization agenda that affects low-income communities the hardest.

So why would these organizations, some of the largest civil rights organizations in the United States, jointly agree to do a one-eighty on standardized testing in just a few months?

On May 9, 2015, Wayne Au, associate professor in the School of Educational Studies at the University of Washington Bothell, and an editor for the social justice teaching magazine Rethinking Schools, had a column in the Washington Post, “Just whose rights do these civil rights groups think they are protecting?”

Au says,

“We cannot, of course, say that these groups came to the defense of high-stakes, standardized testing at the behest of the Gates Foundation, but we should be clear that their politics align with that of the Gates Foundation, and so the fact that these particular civil rights organizations came out in force to support a central reform backed by the foundation should come as no surprise to anyone.”

Au found the following funding of these organizations by the Gates Foundation:

National Council of La Raza: $33,446,160 total

National Urban League: $5,286,017 total

Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights (also listed as the Leadership Conference Education Fund): $3,811,021 total

NAACP: $2,456,106 total

Southeast Asian Resource Center $1,680,105  total

League of United Latin American Citizens: $943,687 total

From the Walton Foundation (Walmart), Au found the following funding for civil rights organizations.

National Council on La Raza: $2,561,741 total

National Urban League (and Urban League of New Orleans): $731,300 total

Au notes,

According to Making Change At Walmart, Walmart is the largest single employer of African Americans in the country (20 percent of the 1.3 million total employees), pays employees an average of $8.81 an hour, and under Walmart’s definition of full-time work, an employee would only earn 65 percent of the 2014 federal poverty rate for a family of four. According to a brief by the Economic Policy Institute, the Walton Family’s total wealth equals that of 79 percent of the combined wealth of all African American families (or almost 78 percent of the combined wealth of all Latino families).

That two major leaders of corporate education reform have targeted civil rights organizations for “philanthropy” is no accident. It allows them to carry out their neoliberal stealth campaign giving their funding a progressive veneer, while actually targeting low-income communities as the most vulnerable for advancing their privatization agenda.
The Walton Foundation has been especially involved with the Black Alliance for Educational Opportunity in advancing the privatization agenda among civil rights organizations. Milwaukee-based BAEO is a promoter of charter schools and vouchers in urban areas all over the country. Founder Howard Fuller has said, “We wouldn’t exist without John Walton and this is one of the reasons I love that man.” See Corporate Education Reform and Civil Rights | Defend Public Education!

The National Urban League, at its recent national convention, gave Jeb Bush the platform to promote charter schools and the tax-credit voucher program which he pioneered while he was governor of Florida. In the August 6, 2015 GOP debate Bush advanced his support of Common Core, taking a states rights position that each state should have its own version of Common Core. This is to bring him in line with Congressional Republicans who are promoting the ALEC states rights position in the current Congressional Conference on the ESEA rewrite.

On the day of the GOP debate, Daniel Pfeiffer, a former senior advisor to President Obama for strategy and communications, tweeted that the White House was grateful to Jeb Bush for helping to promote Common Core. Probably meant in jest, it nevertheless shows the coming together of constituents from the two parties for the common goal of advancing the privatization of public education.

For their part, neoliberal Congressional Democrats continue to promote the goals of the Murphy Amendment in the Conference Committee that had been rejected in the Senate version of the ESEA rewrite. All but two Democrats voted for this doubling down of No Child Left Behind that would expand the role of testing in school and teacher evaluations. It was voted down because Senate Republicans saw it as an expansion of the federal role in education. Teacher blogger Mercedes Schneider describes the Murphy Amendment goal this way:

“Senator Murphy’s (D-CT) amendment 2241 (which Warren co-sponsored) went up for a vote and was rejected 43-54. The 12-page text of Murphy’s SA 2241 reads more like No Child Left Behind (NCLB), with its detailed prescription for reporting on student test results, for “meaningfully differentiating among all public schools” (i.e., grading schools), including publicly identifying the lowest five percent, and, among interventions, potentially firing staff and offering students the option to transfer to other schools and using part of the budget to pay for the transportation.

This amendment would have enacted tough, federal-mandated accountability, akin to setting up an “achievement school district” in every state.”

This will be a major goal of neoliberal Democrats when the Conference Committee resumes deliberations after a five-week summer break in September.

Neoliberal Democrats have used civil rights organizations as a way to justify expanding standardized testing.

The bill’s lead sponsor, Senator Chris Murphy (D-CT), said rejection of expansion of testing would “return the country to the days when states and school districts could ignore achievement gaps and allow poor, minority and disabled children to languish.”

American Federation of Teachers President Randi Weingarten, on a panel at the Network for Public Education, on April 26, 2015 said, (47:00 in the linked video)

“The civil rights community and the President of the United States of America is fighting very hard to have annual tests for one purpose. They have seen in states for years, that if they didn’t have them that states would ignore children.”

The National Education Association, on the other hand, is against the Murphy Amendment because it “would result in an over-identification of failing schools, repeating a key problem with No Child Left Behind.” The union was attacked by the Gates funded Education Trust (see Education Trust: Profoundly Gates-funded, Test-driven-reform Machine by Mercedes Schneider) for its position. Its President, Kati Haycock, accused the NEA of working to protect suburban schools that perform well on average, but not “gritty urban districts” whom she claims need standardized tests to be funded.

U.S. Secretary of Education Arne Duncan has been notorious for using waivers from the NCLB requirements to whip states desperate for federal funding into line. The Race to the Top program uses a carrot-and-stick approach for advancing the neoliberal privatization agenda.

Isn’t it obvious that corporate education reform “philanthropists” are using the same method to hold out desperately needed (whether for organizational survival or greed)  funding to civil rights organizations and others? They attempt to buy the loyalty of civil rights organizations while advancing corporate interests and higher profits that actually sells out the interests of the people they claim to represent.

How can public education and democracy itself survive when the interests of profit are put above the common good?

What would Martin Luther King do?

This is what he said at the close of The Purpose of Education,

“We must remember that intelligence is not enough. Intelligence plus character--that is the goal of true education. The complete education gives one not only power of concentration, but worthy objectives upon which to concentrate. The broad education will, therefore, transmit to one not only the accumulated knowledge of the race but also the accumulated experience of social living. 



If we are not careful, our colleges will produce a group of close-minded, unscientific, illogical propagandists, consumed with immoral acts. Be careful, ‘brethren!’ Be careful, teachers!”

Also see:

National Resolution on High-Stakes Testing | Time Out From Testing

As of this writing, 623 organizations and 19,691 individuals have signed a resolution to the Obama Administration and Congress calling for the “overhaul the Elementary and Secondary Education Act, currently known as the "No Child Left Behind Act," reduce the testing mandates, promote multiple forms of evidence of student learning and school quality in accountability, and not mandate any fixed role for the use of student test scores in evaluating educators.” The Real News

Wayne Au: “Mapping Corporate Education Reform in the Neoliberal State” | solidaridad
solidaridad – July 17, 2015

Black Parents Should Opt Their Children Out of High Stakes Testing | Black Agenda Report
August 4, 2015 – August 4, 2015

Black Lives Do Matter But Do They Move?
The Real News – August 10, 2015

The Betrayal by the Black Elite with Chris Hedges and Cornel West
The Real News – August 11, 2015

Fresh From Giving Prison Abuser Andrew Cuomo An Award, National Urban League Doubles Down On Testing
Perdido Street School – August 13, 2015

The Party's Over

One of the great political feats of the late 20th Century was the manufacture by billionaires of a right-wing cabal of crackpots-under-contract so unabashedly fascist that anyone sane and still voting would be left with a single alternative, which, of course, is the now-familiar brand of corporate, anti-democratic dramaturgy known as the Democratic Party.

It's time for something else, and in the short 18 minute film below, a case is made for it.  Watch and learn to think, organize, and act.  You might say--the Party's over: