"A child's learning is the function more of the characteristics of his classmates than those of the teacher." James Coleman, 1972
Showing posts with label Relay. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Relay. Show all posts

Friday, November 04, 2016

Relay School of Teacher Ed Fakery Now in Nashville

Thanks to former Metro Schools chief, Jesse Register, and former mayor, Karl Dean,  a state-approved "partnership" now exists between Metro Schools and the private teacher education sweatshop, Relay Graduate School of Education.

Relay was created a few years back to train an ongoing supply of indoctrination agents and penal pedagogues in the intellectual and cultural sterilization methods that have made "no excuses" charter schools the social control solution preferred most among white billionaires and their hedge fund managers.

Relay is a program designed to turn would-be teachers into instructional robots, where trainee teachers work with previously programmed mentors to learn how to crank out test scores and compliant behaviors from disadvantaged children.   For its theoretical, conceptual, and practical orientation, such as it is, Relay depends largely upon a single book written by a Harvard MBA, Doug Lemov, who is one of the charter kingpins who started Relay.

If the new trainees cannot extract the target test scores from students that Relay demands, they do not receive their "masters" degree at the end of their training.

Once deemed competent by Relay, however, the young neophyte teacher/programmers are eligible, themselves, to become trainer-professors of new Relay recruits.  And before you know it, the most rabid trainer becomes her own new dean in a new Relay storefront.

Relay's first Dean in Nashville is Linda Mendez Lentz, whose academic preparation is comprised entirely of a Bachelors Degree from the University of Kansas just 8 years ago.  After she and another corporate charter zealot founded a charter school in Nashville, Linda told the Nashville Scene in 2011,
"When we talk about our approach as a school, we're a no-excuses charter school," Mendez explains one morning over coffee at Fido. "That means there's no excuse for why our students can't achieve rigorous academic success. We don't care if they are coming in five grade levels behind. We don't care if their families live in poverty. . . "
Relay's new Dean in Nashville rose quickly from Teach for America, where she taught two years after getting her B.S. in English from the University of Kansas.  That was followed by short stint at the Kansas Department of Corrections as a victim advocate, and then Linda was launched into charter school administration.

Without a graduate degree, publications, research, or academic service records, Linda might appear less prepared than the professors in her new "graduate" school.  Not to worry--there are no professors at Relay.  There are just other teachers who have been brainwashed to install the hard-boiled traditionalism of Doug Lemov's penal pedagogical program into enthused and shiny new corporate ed vehicles who will soon become burned out wrecks.

Where do these new teacher-millenials go after their miseducation at Relay and before they crash a couple of years down the road?  Well, of course, they are sent into the poorest schools where the most neglected children need the most professional, mature teachers.  There they practice the "art and science" of No Excuses Eugenics aimed to brainwash and neurologically rewire children in ways that re-grow the grit that has been ground away by poverty. 

It's impossibly hard work and bound to burn out all but the most cynical and detached--these become the new professors and deans of the Relay College.






Wednesday, April 15, 2015

Relay GSE Wants to Replace Legitimate Teacher Preparation and Professional Development with Digital Merit Badges

In many areas of the country, teachers are disappearing at an alarming rate.  Demoralized, terrorized, berated, hounded, bullied, and just fed up, teachers are increasingly leaving--and sharing their horror stories as they exit the classroom.  Their stories, too, are finding their way through blogs, social media, and into the mainstream, and as a result university teacher education enrollment has plummeted. 

Without any protection from either of the teacher unions, corporate education reformers have remained free to bombard the teaching profession without fear of anti-aircraft fire from union leaders, who have cut deals with the oligarchs to make sure the union home offices are not damaged in the firestorms that result from the continued corporate bombing missions. 

When combined with a recovering economy, the result has been an precipitous drop in teacher ed college enrollment, which has fed the corporate alternative preparations programs, from TFA, TNTP, and the infamous Relay Graduate School of Education--where teacher interns must raise test scores before their teaching degrees are granted.  I have posted here and here on the Relay phenomenon.

There is a new money-making scheme that has been devised by the profiteers who back the Relay chain gang approach to teaching and the penal pedagogy that it entails.  It is based on marketing a concept called micro-credentialing, and it aims to replace legitimate professional development with a series of online training info-bits that teachers can then claim toward their required hours of professional development. Instead of teachers taking college credit courses for ongoing professional development requirements, the hustlers at Relay are now in the business of developing modules based, no doubt, on the "no excuses" bible by Doug Lemov, Teach Like a Robot Champion.  

Relay's first big contract: Washington, DC schools.
Teachers in DCPS must complete 90 professional development “contact hours” every four years in order to renew their teaching license, and DCPS has final approval over what learning counts. The District is exploring innovative options for teacher professional development by piloting a new model, MyPD, which offers more personalized options for teachers to choose from (options that also align with the District’s Teaching and Learning standards). MyPD includes online opportunities such as virtual modules created by Relay Graduate School which are aligned to the the district’s teaching standards — and much like Mozilla’s badges, the strategies covered in Relay’s modules “stack” to convey competency in a larger skill.
Never mind that there is no research to substantiate the use of any of this.  

Wednesday, January 28, 2015

Will Rudd Hold Open Meetings on Corporate Teacher Training Plans at UofM?

On January 14, University of Memphis president, David Rudd, attended a faculty meeting to provide some answers regarding the plan to create a teacher education caste system inside the College of Education.  (See previous stories here, here, here, here, here, here, here, and here.) The plan provides for $5 million per year of public money going to pay corporate know-nothings from Relay Graduate School of Education to provide temp professors and Doug Lemov's "pedagogical content" to train 3 year temps to become total compliance teacher-guards in the corporate charter chain gangs in Memphis.

I was at that meeting when Rudd noticed that the Commercial Appeal's education reporter, Jane Roberts, had entered the room.  He asked her to leave unless someone objected.  When I objected, he called for vote among education faculty to decide if "outsiders" should stay at the meeting.  The vote was conducted by a show of hands with Rudd peering from the front of the room.  The majority of  education faculty voted to have us ejected.

Last week one of the "outsider" professors at that meeting wrote to Rudd, asking if a promised public meeting would be held.  Below is that letter with Rudd's response and another letter responding to Rudd's dissembling.

Will there be a meeting to find out answers to some basic questions, such as
  • Why is a New York corporation being offered $5 million per year in University funds to provide third rate teacher "training" of University of Memphis undergraduates, who have no idea what they are getting into?
  • What are the elements of this bogus teacher education program for Memphis's poor children who are locked down in chain gang charters?
  • Why is a Research 1 public university offering the poorest children of Memphis temporary beginning teachers who are trained in grinding out test scores, when these children need the most experienced, caring, and professionally prepared teachers?  Where is the administrative and moral accountability?
  • Who will the professors be in this program if it materializes, and what kind of educational preparation must they have?
  • Why was this program developed in secret, without input from the public or the faculty of the University of Memphis?
  • Why must University of Memphis departments pay for space, while Relay is offered classrooms without charge?
  • Why does the University of Memphis collect hefty accounting fees for administering federal grants, when millions in private philanthropic money will pass through the university free of such charges?
  • How much of the $5 million (per year) handout to Relay will is go for administrative costs?
  • Why was Relay chosen for this mission to corporatize a public university?
  • What role did Governor Haslam's office play in this initiative?
No doubt there will be other questions.

Inquiry letter from art professor, Cedar Nordbye:
From: Cedar Lorca Nordbye (cnordbye)
Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2015 2:26 PM
To: Michael David Rudd (mdrudd)
Cc: robertsj@commercialappeal.com; Wierdl (mwierdl)
Subject: Open meeting to discuss teachers certification program

Dear President Rudd, 
At the meeting in Ball Hall earlier this month, when, under your supervision, education faculty voted to have a closed meeting and to remove visitors (including faculty from directly impacted departments) you promised to me that we could have another meeting which would be open to the whole community. Would you be willing now to follow up on that and hold such a meeting? Thank you very much, Cedar
Rudd's reply:
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 7:44 PM, Michael David Rudd (mdrudd) wrote:
Dear Cedar:

I appreciate the note.  We can certainly hold an open meeting, simply work with Stephanie to coordinate a date/time.  Additionally, I'm more than happy to meet with the Faculty Senate, something I've now offered several times but have yet to hear back. With respect to the COE, a few clarifications are important.  It's not a meeting I was "supervising".  It was a meeting in response to a letter received from ICL faculty,and one coordinated by the Dean.  The meeting addressed COE business, as do all of our college-specific meetings. College and department-specific meetings are not "open".  I've copied our general counsel if you have questions.  It should also be pointed out that I turned the meeting over to the faculty to address their wishes about making it a college-specific meeting.  If you recall, they publicly voted, 42-11 (80%-20%) by my memory, to make it a college-specific meeting.
. . . .I look forward to hearing your thoughts, along with additional faculty interested in participating.  Please coordinate with Stephanie in my office and Jan in our Provost's office to get something set up.

Regards, MDR



Reply to Rudd by math professor, Dr. Wierdl:
From: Wierdl Máté
Date: Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 6:25 AM
Dear David,

My interpretation of the ICL meeting was different. 

You told the COE faculty you want to have an intimate conversation with them, and that's why outsiders like me should leave.  Then you called for an open  vote in this matter. 

If I was given three minutes  to explain why I should be present, then ask  COE faculty to vote secretly, the outcome of the vote could have been very different.

The meeting took place exactly because of the work of the journalist who exposed the secret planning of the relay program, and because I  communicated  the journalist's work to the senate.  And we are the ones who got kicked out.

There are fundamental problems with running the Relay program on campus, and the program has consequences to every department.   What message do you think you sent out when you recommended to kick  out those who could have helped  the COE to form a more educated opinion about the Relay program?

What were the new secrets that needed to be discussed only between COE and
administrators?

My understanding is that Relay and UofM is about to sign an MOU and Relay will start advertising in classes starting February.  So we have yet another project where faculty is delegated just to stand by without given a role in the decision making. 

The only thing we can do is submit public records' requests to our own university to find out what happened.  Great way to run a public university, David.

Best,

Máté