To the Editor:
As a graduate student in education at Monmouth University in
West Long Branch, New Jersey, I am currently taking a course in
qualitative research. The Bush-style education for teachers being
instituted at South Methodist University is a dangerous affront
to the future of education in this country that has serious
implications for a democratic and free society. The exclusive
emphasis on quantitative research built into the No Child Left
Behind Act is an ideological assault on the equally important
qualitative research practices integral to other forms of
scientific inquiry that can shed light on critical
consequences of education policy.
This narrow view of “scientifically-based research” as
defined in NCLB, threatens educational opportunities for
students because it does not take the whole child or the
critical significance of a broad-based curriculum into
consideration. The very real effects of educational
techniques and practices cannot be discerned simply by
analyzing numbers, statistics and test scores. Secretary of
Education Margaret Spelling’s call for an overhaul of teacher
preparation and accountability should be viewed with great
trepidation byanyone who cares about the psychological,
emotional and intellectual well-beingof our nation’s
children.
Judy Rabin
This space explores issues in public education policy, and it advocates for a commitment to and a re-examination of the democratic purposes of schools. If there is some urgency in the message, it is due to the current reform efforts that are based on a radical re-invention of education, now spearheaded by a psychometric blitzkrieg of "metastasizing testing" aimed at dismantling a public education system that took almost 200 years to build. JH August, 2005
Thursday, November 03, 2005
A Response to the Times
Judy Rabin posts this letter to the Times on the "new science of education" espoused by SMU's new school for test score improvement:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment