Jay Mathews will probably say that we cannot be sure if Rhee, now secure in her role as the Sarah Palin of corporate ed reform, knows that the lies she's telling now are lies. Hey, she could just be repeating fake facts that she has been handed by the same gofers to the Oligarchs who supplied the fake facts for Guggenheim's not-nominated-for-an Oscar, Waiting for Superman. What do we know?!
With so many dollar to raise (a billion of them) before the 2012 elections, who can blame her for pulling lines out of her broomstick to spice up the slick ads for potential donors. Here is a recent fabulous fabrication that Michelle offers during a staged discussion led by Rupert Murdoch's chief advisor on education, Joel Klein:
"When I travel around the country talking about these issues, I inevitably come up against, you know, wealthy folks in the suburbs who say, 'Well, but my kids are fine,'" Michelle Rhee, a former Washington, D.C., schools chancellor, said during a recent gathering at The Daily.Could Rhee have gotten her numbers from Klein's researchers over at Fox News, where they simply make it up when the facts don't support their agenda? Michelle certainly did not get them from the most recent international test comparison (PISA) published by OECD, which has been all over the media since early December.
"I say, 'Did you know that the top 5 percent of kids in America, the top five — the ones that are going to Choate and Andover and all these great places, they are 25th out of 30 nations, compared to their global counterparts?''
As reported by the NYTimes, the Program for International Student Assessment shows the only slight improvement overall to the mediocre U. S. results in 2006. In Math in 2009, the U. S. was placed 31th of 32 nations; in Reading, the U. S. finished 17th; in Science, 23rd. So what's wrong with Rhee's averaging out sort of to get 25th?
Rhee's claim is that the top 5% of students have these low scores, when, in fact, they do not. Not even close. OECD disaggregates scores based on percentile rankings, and here are the results below, for reading, math, and science. Contrary to Rhee's lie, our top students 10% (90th percentil of students outscore any nation and the Chinese city-state, Shanghai. When you look at the top 5% of American students (95th percentile), these kids leave the rest of the world in the dust in reading, math, and science. Click any of the charts to enlarge.
In reading, top-scoring Shanghai scored 556. As you can see, our top 25% bested that score.
Unfortunately, the U. S. is tops in another category, and that is in the percentage of students living in poverty--21.7%. And as this other chart below from Highlights From PISA 2009 shows, poverty levels are directly correlated to PISA scores, here in reading:
For further analysis, go to this piece by the NAASP. Here are some facts that should be introduced the next time you get a chance to hear Michelle Rhee start spouting her vitriolic falsehood:
· Of all the nations participating in the PISA assessment, the U.S. has, by far, the largest number of students living in poverty--21.7%. The next closest nations in terms of poverty levels are the United Kingdom and New Zealand have poverty rates that are 75% of ours.· U.S. students in schools with 10% or less poverty are number one country in the world.· U.S. students in schools with 10-24.9% poverty are third behind Korea, and Finland.· U.S. students in schools with 25-50% poverty are tenth in the world.· U.S. students in schools with greater than 50% poverty are near the bottom.