This space explores issues in public education policy, and it advocates for a commitment to and a re-examination of the democratic purposes of schools. If there is some urgency in the message, it is due to the current reform efforts that are based on a radical re-invention of education, now spearheaded by a psychometric blitzkrieg of "metastasizing testing" aimed at dismantling a public education system that took almost 200 years to build. JH August, 2005
Wednesday, February 13, 2013
Allergy to reading among reading experts
A blog in Ed Week has the headline “Students Must Learn More Words, Say Studies.” Based on a yet to be published article in the Reading Research Quarterly, it asserts that research shows that teachers are not teaching enough vocabulary.
http://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2013/02/06/20vocabulary_ep.h32.html?tkn=TZMFgk7NAkmjOoC5gr4c2bOzxwjAgLv%2BoQnD&cmp=ENL-EU-NEWS1
Only two of those who posted comments and none of the experts cited in the article (except for Hirsch) appear to be even aware of the hypothesis (not to mention the massive research showing) that vocabulary is gradually acquired from reading. The author of the article also seems to be unaware of it.
Here is my understated post, on the Ed Week website:
I agree with Dr. Bob and Karl Wheatley: I think research clearly shows that vocabulary comes from reading (and hearing stories).
Some current papers on this topic, both available for free download at: http://www.sdkrashen.com/index.php?cat=2
1. Krashen, S. Reading and Vocabulary Acquisition: Supporting Evidence and Some Objections. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 1 (1): 27-43, 2013.
2. Krashen, S. Direct Instruction of Academic Vocabulary: What About Real Reading? Reading Research Quarterly, 47(3): 233. 2012)
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Thank you for restating what every teacher knows or should know. Kids need to read and be read to for a plethora of reasons!
ReplyDelete