Court ruling favors charter schools
Employees cannot use federal civil rights laws to sue the owners of Arizona charter schools, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled Monday.
The judges acknowledged that, under Arizona law, charter schools are "public schools." They are authorized to operate under state law and must comply with some - but not all - of the same requirements as traditional district schools.
But Judge Sandra Ikuta, writing for the unanimous court, said that does not make the school and its owners "state actors," something required to make a civil rights challenge. Instead, the court concluded, the school is a private company despite those state laws, at least for purposes of deciding who to hire, fire and, in this case, whether to provide a referral for a future job.
The ruling is a setback for Michael Caviness, who claims that actions by Horizon Community Learning Center employees prevented him from getting a job with the Mesa Unified School District. But attorney David Larkin, who represents Caviness, said it could have broader implications for those who work for charter schools.
For example, he said, public school employees who make comments in the media on matters of public concern are protected against retaliation from their principals and school boards. He said the civil rights laws his client cited can clearly be used to sue those officials for violating the teacher's freedom of speech.
"If a charter school teacher now does that, they don't have the (same) right to freedom of speech as a public school employee," he said.
So it's not some crazy left-wing blabble to raise concerns about charters being a privatization movement - but the pro-charter crowd will do all they can to misinform the public about the private-ness of public schools. The 9th Court's ruling further confirms the privateness of charter schools; sure, they operate with public funds, but they're fall less transparent than most public schools (and public schools are not as transparent as they should be - see Michelle Rhee in particular).
They often claim education is a "civil right," but their pro-charter agenda wipes away your civil rights.
As a native of New Orleans returning to my great city, I was terminated from my certfied teaching position at Lake Forest Elementary Charter School without reason, after only one month. Upon accepting the job "at will," there were alot of issues I encountered, including my social security number being taken to make 1500 copies, a filthy classroom with a multitude of brand new materials housed in closets covered with dust,bugs and spider webs. Also, I had to report problems with the lighting/power(electrical)several times.Due to a lack of communication via phone,computer,copies,etc.it greatly inteferred with my effectiveness as a teacher. Upon addressing these issues with the administrators, I was soon told that they had to let me go!Please Advise...ReplyDelete