The candidates for state superintendent of education disagree on the teaching of evolution in public schools, with Republican Karen Floyd interpreting the most recent state decision on the issue as opening the door for inclusion of intelligent design theory in the classroom.
"I support the Education Oversight (Committee)'s premise that we should have critical analysis so that the discussion of intelligent design is not prohibited and could be part of the classroom discussion," Floyd said.
Democrat Jim Rex said he's in favor of students critically analyzing what they learn but believes intelligent design theory, which holds that natural selection and random mutation alone can't account for the complexity of life, doesn't belong in a science classroom. . .
This space explores issues in public education policy, and it advocates for a commitment to and a re-examination of the democratic purposes of schools. If there is some urgency in the message, it is due to the current reform efforts that are based on a radical re-invention of education, now spearheaded by a psychometric blitzkrieg of "metastasizing testing" aimed at dismantling a public education system that took almost 200 years to build. JH August, 2005
Monday, November 06, 2006
Clear Choice in S.C. Superintendent's Race
Want to keep science in the science classroom? From Greenville Online:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment