HBA will be governed by an independent, fiscally responsible governing board with a breadth of experience, and will be operated by Mosaica Education, Inc., an educational service provider with 76 school programs in seven states, the District of Columbia, and the Middle East.
Mosaica Education, Inc. manages 76 public charter school programs, serving 14,000 students in seven states, the District of Columbia, and the Persian Gulf country of Qatar. It was founded in January 1997 by Dr. Dawn Eidelman (currently MEI’s Chief Education Officer and the President of the Paragon Division) and her husband, Gene Eidelman. Michael J. Connelly was named Chief Executive Officer in 1998.
The Company opened its first school in September 1997. Five of the schools it currently manages were acquired by the Company in connection with its acquisition of Advantage Schools, Inc. in August 2001. All other schools were developed by community boards in partnership with MEI as the service provider through start-up initiatives. The Company is privately held and venture-capital funded. Included in its shareholder base are a number of prominent private equity firms, including Murphy & Partners, J.P. Morgan Partners, Credit Suisse First Boston, U.S. Trust, Fidelity Investors and Bessemer Securities. [My bold]
For the term of the Charter, MEI will provide to the Academy the following administrative services:
Personnel Management. Management and professional development of all personnel providing Educational Services and Administrative Services;
Facility Operation and Maintenance. Operation and maintenance of the charter school’s facility (the “Facility”) to the extent consistent with any and all leases or other documents pertaining to the Facility;
Business Administration. Administration of all business aspects of the charter school;
Transportation and Food Services. Provision of transportation and food services for the students enrolled at the charter school, as required by the Board;
Public Relations. Any and all advertising and public relations with the community and the media;
Budgeting and Financial Reporting.
Maintenance of Financial, Business and Student Records.
Admissions. Implementation of the school’s admission policy;
Student Hearings. Administration and enforcement of student disciplinary and special education;
Semester Reports. MEI will provide to the Board on a semester basis, (or more often if necessary for the Board to satisfy its obligations under the Charter, the Code and other applicable laws and regulations) a report detailing (A) student academic performance, and (B) MEI’s performance on administering Educational Services and Administrative Services;
Rules and Procedures. MEI will enforce the rules, regulations and procedures adopted by the charter school not in direct conflict with the management agreement, the Charter, the Code and other applicable laws and regulations. MEI will recommend rules, regulations and procedures applicable to the charter school and its students; and
Additional Administrative Services. Any other services reasonably necessary or expedient for the effective administration of the charter school.
Coweta Charter Academy will have a two-tiered governance structure. The Georgia Charter Educational Foundation, Inc. is the Founding Board and maintains ultimate responsibility for Coweta Charter Academy.Here's where it gets even more interesting. The connection between the Georgia Charter Educational Foundation and CSUSA isn't entirely clear, but the foundation has a whole bunch of info on their website about CSUSA (it's also quite evident, based on these minutes from the foundation's July 16th, 2009 meeting, that the two groups are mighty friendly with each other). Additionally, the Georgia Charter Educational Foundation, Inc is the actual petitioner for the charter, and their governing board is led by John McIntyre, Jr, the executive director at Morgan Stanley's Atlanta branch. The charter's application makes no qualms about CSUSA's intent to turn a profit:
Contracting with CSUSA is in the best financial interest of the charter school because their compensation philosophy is rooted in school performance. If the school succeeds, then fees are paid. If the school is not successful, then the management company will not make a profit. As defined in the sample management agreement, CSUSA proposes a whole management method for determining fees. This method is more consistent with their comprehensive style of education management and by its nature holds them accountable for performance across all facets of school operations.
The Georgia Charter Educational Foundation, through Red Apple Development, has executed a purchase and sale agreement for a specific parcel of land in the region specified above. Due diligence is currently being conducted on the site and actual closing on the property is contingent upon approval of Coweta Charter Academy’s Start-Up Charter Petition.
The Mosaica story is a mystery, and to me it's kind of emblematic of how murky the charter industry can be.ReplyDelete
Mosaica actually started in my area, the San Francisco Bay Area -- it had a little space in an office park in San Rafael, Marin County (I dropped in to check it out) -- but never ran any schools in California. I did a little research around 2001, and it was started by a local (Marin County) couple who I believe were not educators. At the time it appeared to have a mail drop in New York City and used both the NYC and San Rafael addresses.
Mosaica hit my radar because the Philly newspapers covered the situation when it was kicked out of a school it had been running in Bensalem, PA. I recall that teachers said Mosaica was making up its supposedly customized curriculum on the spot as it went along, basically winging it the day before it was taught. I haven't followed it since, but the term "fly-by-night" would be apt. It's amazing that it's still around, and just shows what mysterious operators the charter movement is nuturing.
Oh, and don't forget New Orleans, even though the incompetent crooks in Georgia seem to have done so:ReplyDelete